![]() |
||
|
|
by
Thu Sep 20, 2007 at 08:26:59 PM EST The current gathering of the World Tribunal on Iraq (WTI) is in Istanbul, and on Monday, they are due to hand down "a symbolic verdict" on the the United States and the Coalition of the Willing -- and their actions against the people of Iraq.The World Tribunal on Iraq (WTI) is a people's court consisting of unelected intellectuals, human rights campaigners and non-governmental organizations. It sprung from the anti-war movement and is modelled on the Russell Tribunal of the American movement against the Vietnam War. It counts among its supporters Indian author Arundhati Roy and United Nations assistant general secretary Denis Halliday, though consciously avoids a hierarchical structure. The WTI routinely finds that the coalition forces in Iraq are guilty of war crimes and violations of the Geneva Conventions. Criticized as a "kangaroo court" by supporters of the war, it receives less coverage in the United States and UK than in the Middle East and Europe. Source
commentary :: :: :: buzz-it!
The WTI began organizing in June of 2003 and since then, has held 20 "hearings" in various locations around the globe to discuss and hear testimony on "war crimes" committed by coalition forces and the legality of the war in Iraq. The purpose of the tribunal is to "bear witness", not to offer legal opinion or mete out justice. And bear witness it does, interviewing detainees, academics, medical professionals and Iraqi citizens. The stories they tell make one ashamed of what has been done in our name ... so far across the ocean it takes sleuthing to find the truth.
This organization does not get much media attention in the US or Great Britain, but in the Arab world the hearings and the findings are anxiously awaited. According to testimony and research compiled by the WTI, the US has caused more deaths in Iraq than Saddam Hussein.1
British journalist Robert Fisk reports on July 14, 2004 Academics targeted as murder and mayhem hits Iraqi colleges.
Just who the modern-day Mongols are remains a painful mystery of our story. Disgruntled students they are not. Baathist-hunters some of them might be - all heads of academic departments were forced to join Saddam's party - but none of the murdered Baghdad university staff were believed to be anything more than card-carriers. According to the Brussels Tribunal, no one has yet been held accountable for the deaths of these academics, but "as an occupying power, and under international humanitarian law, the final responsibility for protecting Iraqi citizens, including academics, lies with the United States."2
On June 27th, 2005 Dahr Jamail reports for ZNet on the Culminating Session of the WTI: In May of 2004 I interviewed a man who had just been released from Abu Ghraib. Like so many I interviewed from various US military detention facilities who'd been tortured horrifically, he still managed to maintain his sense of humor.
Later in the article Jamail continues: Abbas did not feel this was the work of a few individual soldiers. "This was organized, it wasn't just individuals, and every one of the troops in Abu Ghraib was responsible for it."
Also on June 27th Truthout reports: The Jury defined this war as one of the most unjust in history: 'The Bush and Blair administrations blatantly ignored the massive opposition to the war expressed by millions of people around the world. They embarked upon one of the most unjust, immoral, and cowardly wars in history. The Anglo-American occupation of Iraq of the last 27 months has led to the destruction and devastation of the Iraqi state and society. Law and order have broken down completely, resulting in a pervasive lack of human security; the physical infrastructure is in shambles; the health care delivery system is a mess; the education system has ceased to function; there is massive environmental and ecological devastation; and, the cultural and archeological heritage of the Iraqi people has been desecrated.'
So, on Monday, over four years since the start of the illegal occupation of Iraq, the WTI will deliver it's official findings. It will list the UN handling of the situation in Iraq as a massive failure and will "condemn" both the US and British governments for their "empire-building" at the expense of Iraqi civilians.
[Indian novelist Arundhati] Roy told the gathering here: "The evidence collated in this tribunal should ... be used by the International Criminal Court -- whose jurisdiction the United States does not recognize -- to try as war criminals George Bush, Tony Blair, John Howard, Silvio Berlusconi, and all those government officials, army generals, and corporate CEOs who participated in this war and now benefit from it."
There is not much hope that these findings will have any media play here in the US -- other than in the blogosphere and independent media. And even less hope that it will have any impact at all on the continuation of the Bush Wars, but at least history will have a record of the crimes that have been perpretrated. Footnotes
The Paradox, the Reality and the World Tribunal on Iraq | 6 comments (6 topical, 0 hidden)
The Paradox, the Reality and the World Tribunal on Iraq | 6 comments (6 topical, 0 hidden)
|
Support ePluribus Media -- Support Citizen Powered Journalism! recent commentaries
front page
Tuesday November 27th
Monday November 26th
Sunday November 25th
|