Subscribe to ePluribus Media



ePluribus Media Store


Want Headlines via Email?
Enter your email address:


Help Save 1.800.SUICIDE


"...You Don't Introduce New Products in August"

by rcs1

Promoted by GreyHawk. "Listen my children and you shall hear...ClammyC's great rant and rallying cry." Don't let the "new product" pass inspection and make it to market. Originally posted Sat Sep 01, 2007 at 08:14:49 PM EST

Actually (and as many of us know), the entire quote by Andy Card back in September 2002 was "From a marketing point of view, you don't introduce new products in August."  Well, it is September 1, and the time is just about here for another marketing initiative by the callous destructive forces that don't really care about what the people of this country, or anyone else for that matter says about the absolutely insane idea to bomb or "take action" against Iran.

This "marketing campaign" actually began years ago, back when Iran was labeled part of the "Axis of Evil", and again in early 2004, when the first rumors of just how evil they were because its leader (who was already lacking support in his own country) stared down The Decider Guy and told him to go scratch - Iran was reconstituting its nuclear program.  For energy purposes, we were told.  And even if it wasn't for energy purposes, that isn't the point.


commentary :: :: :: buzz-it!
Back in December 2006, the foundation was laid for another "marketing campaign".  This one started with the same booga booga about nook-you-luhr weapons, just like the previous "marketing campaign" about Iraq started.  Then it became Iranian weapons parts found in Iraq, despite the fact that nearly 200,000 US weapons were lost, and the US was funding and providing weapons to "former" insurgents, if they promised not to attack our troops.

And just as the marketing campaign for New Coke failed, so did this one - as it was immediately smacked down by the top military advisor, Peter Pace.  The reward for Mr. Pace?  Well, a quick "retirement" - to spend more time with his family, no doubt.

But this time, like Freddy Kruger, the "marketing campaign" wouldn't die.  More and more excuses and reasons to "shock and awe" the bad brown people in Iran would be "test marketed" and now, the New and ImprovedTM bullshit, um, lies, um, irrelevant half truths, um, innuendo, excuses for bombing Iran will be rolled out over the next weeks, including references to the "newly classified as terrorist group Iranian military".

Most people are on to this charade, but no chances can be taken.   Grand Moff Texan had a great diary on the frames to use and the way to address this.  The best point he makes is that this is Bush's and his supporters' planned attack.  NOT the United States'.  And as the airwaves are blanketed with how we don't want to see a mushroom cloud, or that the last thing this world needs is Iran exercising influence in Iraq or that if we leave, Iran will fill the "power vacuum" (shouldn't this have been considered in 2002?), there needs to be major pushback.

Not this same crap again.  These claims were not credible back in 2002 and they are the EXACT same claims again.  These people are simply not believable.

What makes this even more disgusting than even 2002 is that after five years of death and destruction not to mention complete unmitigated disaster and failure, it is still looked at as a "marketing campaign".  Lives at stake.  Lives ruined.  Families ruined.  Economy in the shitter.  Massive upheaval.  And an incredibly unpopular occupation of Iraq, not to mention this not being a remotely popular idea at all among all but a small but foaming at the mouth crew of megalomaniac idiots.

There is absolutely no rationale that would warrant bombing or invading Iran.  It is that simple.  The burden of proof is on those who say we have to bomb.  There is no trust or benefit of the doubt.  You don't market a war.  It is a sick thought and a despicable approach to take when it comes to an almost always unnecessary act of aggression.

Here is a way and here is another way and here is yet another way that you can write to Congress to urge them to unequivocally denounce this horrific plan and demand action.  Or you can call this number: (202) 224-3121.

Or, here are some ways to contact the media to simply and forcefully pull the curtain back on this deadly nonsense and hopefully stop more senseless killing and a humanitarian crisis of unimaginable proportions.

These war profiteering crooks sold this country and the world a bag of crap once.  We can't let them resell a used, recycled and more deadly bag of crap.

 

Display:
in orange

by clammyc on Sat Sep 01, 2007 at 08:15:41 PM EST
that they are going to strike Iran.  But one thing that does concern me is Cheney's ability to influence Bush is now stronger than ever with the last few resignations from the WH and DOJ.  Bush has had a mass exodus of trusted staff while Cheney has lost one?  I wouldn't be surprised to find out Cheney was the one behind the latest executive order that will "designate Iran's Revolutionary Guard Corps, the country's 125,000-strong elite military branch, as a 'specially designated global terrorist...'"

Neither Cheney or Bush have anything at risk other than their legacy, which isn't looking to bright these days either.

by standingup on Sat Sep 01, 2007 at 11:40:47 PM EST

It looked dicey for a short period -- I thought they were not going to be able to push it -- but with the recent news and changes, I'm more convinced than ever that Bush sees it as the only option left to try and get whatever he can out of his Presidency; his legacy is shot to hell.

Cheney knows this, and was always going for the Iran strike due to the profiteering aspect in both energy and weapons.

Rummy also pushed for it, and set the stage as quickly and fully as possible, switching gears almost immediately into announcing the "long war" bs shortly after the Iraq invasion began.

...hopefully, I'll get a piece finished soon that will tie enough threads together that people will act, even if only to ensure that sanity and precautions are taken to avoid such a major catastrophe in spite of not believing it will happen...

I'd much rather be "safe" than "sorry" -- particularly if my personal read of the situation is correct.  "Sorry" just won't cut it...

:(

by GreyHawk on Sat Sep 01, 2007 at 11:50:09 PM EST
[ Parent ]

the possibility this could all be a distraction too.  There is still something that feels odd about Gonzales, Kim and Schlotzman bailing from the DOJ and Rove from the White House within a period of a couple of weeks.  There will be more hearings next week into FISA.  Goldsmith's testimony before the SJC could bring out even more info on warrantless wiretapping before the changes were made post the Ashcroft hospital visit.

by standingup on Sun Sep 02, 2007 at 12:14:26 AM EST

Support ePluribus Media -- Support Citizen Powered Journalism!

ePluribus Media

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

members


community front page

make a new account


Username:
Password:

create account | faq | search | community front page |