Subscribe to ePluribus Media



ePluribus Media Store


Want Headlines via Email?
Enter your email address:


Help Save 1.800.SUICIDE


Alberto Gonzales is finished .............. testifying.

by rcs1

Cho and Roxy Caraway.

For political junkies and those addicted to the U.S. Attorney and Department of Justice Soap Opera, today's testimony by "I don't Recall" Alberto Gonzales was, well, confirmation that his days ought to be numbered.

As Time's headline says it: Gonzales Digs a Deeper Hole

Sen. Arlen Specter was not happy with the answers -- which were non-answers and evasions -- coming from the Attorney General.

Specter later circled back to Gonzales on the matter, warning him: "My suggestion to you is you review your testimony to find out if your credibility has been breached to the point of being actionable," Specter said.

The maximum penalty for being caught lying to Congress is five years in prison and a fine of $250,000 per count. Specter wryly noted to reporters during a break that there is a jail in the Capitol complex.

So what is it about Gonzales that keeps him safely from being fired? Adam Lambert (clammyc) in his article Who Is Alberto Gonzales? wrote back in March that

If there is one word that describes Gonzales' relationship with George W. Bush and his rise to Attorney General, it is loyalty. Since being appointed to Secretary of State, Gonzales has taken numerous actions that can only be justified as extreme loyalty to the man who has put him in positions for which, some say, that Gonzales had few prior qualifications.
And now it appears that even his protector, George W. Bush, may no longer be able to shelter Gonzales.


commentary :: :: :: buzz-it!
Taking look at Alberto Gonzales's -- how shall we say it? -- steadfastness, Andrew Cohen in his earlier Washington Post entry Rough Justice - The Case Against Alberto Gonzales, notes this:
He has run true to form over the past two years and has diverted hardly at all from his long history of dogged obedience to the President, which often has come at the cost of institutional independence and adherence to the rule of law.
But today, the evasiveness, the memory lapses, the obfuscation, prevarication, and downright lying were the focus of today's (7-24-07) Bench Conference entry, where Cohen shares the exchange between Schumer and Gonzales from Tuesday's hearing:
GONZALES: I don't know. But I told the spokesperson to go back and clarify my statement...

SCHUMER: Well, wait a minute, sir. Sir, with all due respect -- and if I could have some order here, Mr. Chairman -- in all due respect, you're just saying, "Well, it was clarified with the reporter," and you don't even know what he said. You don't even know what the clarification is. Sir, how can you say that you should stay on as attorney general when we go through exercise like this, where you're bobbing and weaving and ducking to avoid admitting that you deceived the committee? And now you don't even know. I'll give you another chance: You're hanging your hat on the fact that you clarified the statement two days later. You're now telling us that is was a spokesperson who did it. What did that spokesperson say? Tell me now, how do you clarify this?

GONZALES: I don't know, but I'll find out and get back to you.

But before we all start jumping up and down with glee over the end days of Alberto, consider who might replace him. Way way way back in March of this year, McClatchy Washington Bureau published the short list of possible replacements. Lambert and the ePluribus Media research crew pulled together some background data on five of them in Lambert's Meet the new boss? Same as the old boss ...

  1. Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff
  2. SEC Chairman Chris Cox
  3. White House anti-terrorism advisor Francis Fragos Townsend
  4. former Deputy Attorney General Larry Thompson
  5. former Solicitor General Theodore Olsen

Lambert closes his overview of these five with the then prescient observation:

Even with all of the speculation and calls for resignation or the ouster of Attorney General Gonzales, this is unlikely to be resolved in the short term. Since the White House and Congress have been squaring off on every issue - from Iraq to the US Attorney firings to Executive Privilege claims and many other matters, and given the history between Gonzales and President Bush, we may not see Gonzales resign or be fired unless he is facing impeachment and conviction. However, in light of the fact that a number of people are being mentioned as future candidates for Attorney General, it behooves us to find out a bit more about these potential candidates.
The time may be at hand... according to the CNN/Time's report, Senator Rockefeller said: "Once again he [Gonzales]'s making up something to protect himself and creating situations that never happened ...based on what I know about it, I'd have to say" Gonzales has committed perjury."

Further reading from from the ePluribus Media Community and on the ePluribus Media Journal

Display:
word "testify".

by roxy317 on Tue Jul 24, 2007 at 08:02:31 PM EST
more than unbelievable and extremely frightening

by TXsharon on Tue Jul 24, 2007 at 08:06:33 PM EST
... the kind of cavalier behavior that begets the breakdown of civil society and our democracy... especially if he gets away with it.

by Cho on Tue Jul 24, 2007 at 08:09:21 PM EST
Taylor+Talev:  GOP senator threatens legal action against White House
The proposal from Sen. Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania, the senior Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee, ratchets up aseven-month standoff between the White House and Congress over whether former and current White House officials should be compelled to testify or provide documents related to the firings.

He's a long way from gone, and much of this is posturing.  I'll believe Congress has the will to act when Meiers is in a cell inside the building.  (Lederman's "Option Two").

by rba on Tue Jul 24, 2007 at 08:17:34 PM EST

"I think he was untruthful," Rockefeller said in an interview with McClatchy Newspapers.
That I believe, if Aaron Barlow is around he can correct me, is what the old English would call a litote, a description of a thing by what it is not... in order to emphasis its 'notness'....

Anywho, "he's lying" suffices.

by Cho on Tue Jul 24, 2007 at 08:30:50 PM EST
[ Parent ]

they are not letting her testify... which I don't understand, since she would probably also just do the "I don't Recall" shuffle.

by Cho on Tue Jul 24, 2007 at 08:39:51 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I cannot stand the posture he portrays.  What I am wondering is how many times during the testimony did he appear to be writing down something.... He's a pretender....and contributor to "democracy withers"!

by avahome on Tue Jul 24, 2007 at 08:19:40 PM EST
thanks, Avahome, that was the phrase I was trying to think of... when they don't even break into a sweat over fear of being caught lying... and say with complete disregard for our Constitution, our laws, and our republic... "I don't recall; I don't remember; etc. etc."  ... Yikes!

by Cho on Tue Jul 24, 2007 at 08:25:04 PM EST
[ Parent ]
never ever thought it would play out right in front of our eyes REPEATEDLY!

by avahome on Tue Jul 24, 2007 at 08:35:10 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I don't recall.  Sheesh! his memory problem alone makes him unfit to head the Justice Department.

by roxy317 on Tue Jul 24, 2007 at 08:31:40 PM EST

Support ePluribus Media -- Support Citizen Powered Journalism!

ePluribus Media

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

members


community front page

make a new account


Username:
Password:

create account | faq | search | community front page |