![]() |
||
|
|
by
Mon Jul 16, 2007 at 11:47:47 AM EST
Dr. Shields' study on the politicization of U.S. Department of Justice investigations into elected office holders corruption includes, of course, the bribery case and subsequent conviction of Don Siegelman, Governor of Alabama, who -- years prior to the bribery brouhaha -- was edged out in 2002 by a mysterious late night flipping of 6000 votes in Baldwin County.
Old news, but worth a recap given the fresh insights around the U.S. Attorney purges and the subsequent revelations of the Bush Administration's reshaping the Department of Justice into a wing of the Republican party. From Wikipedia: On the night of the 2002 election, in which Siegelman ran as the incumbent against Republican Bob Riley, a computer error was reported by election officials in Baldwin County. A post-midnight recount was conducted which gave Riley the victory in that county and made the difference in the statewide result. The legality of the recount, which was conducted without the participation of Democratic observers, was challenged. Then-Attorney General Bill Pryor ruled that the recount would stand and his interpretation was upheld by state courts.The Department of Justice did not intercede. commentary :: :: :: buzz-it!
As Scott Horton in his July 13: Noel Hillman and the Siegelman Case No Comment puts it:
That left the Justice Department in Washington, which had a long and highly respected record of intervention in the Deep South when questions of voting fraud have arisen. This record, however, came to an abrupt end in 2001. The Justice Department official responsible for a question of voting fraud which directly involved the conduct of voting officials—as was the case in the Bay Minette incident—was Noel Hillman. Hillman should have looked at the case and acted upon it. However, Hillman did nothing.Subsequently, as the Shields' study reminds us, Siegelman became the target of a U.S. Attorney investigation into bribery, an investigation conveniently timed to knock Siegleman out of contention for a renewed run for the Governorship. With the many subsequent revelations of the Rovian way of doing politics, the pattern of investigating Democratic candidates has surfaced. Today, in his Harpers Magazine No Comment entry, Scott Horton continues his excellence coverage by editorializing about the 44 principled individuals dedicated to righting what they see as an egregious wrong:J'Accuse:
Today forty-four attorneys general from forty of the fifty states of the Union petition the United States Congress demanding a formal inquiry into the prosecution of Don Siegelman, the former Governor of Alabama, who was falsely charged, tried and convicted in federal court proceedings in Alabama. These proceedings constitute an indelible stain on the reputation of our nation for justice, which cannot be purged until they are set aside and those who committed these crimes mockingly in the name of justice are held to account for their misconduct.(hattip to Regroce over on buzzflash for spotting this.) Horton has written about the Siegelman case several times recently:
Hillman is also one of four sitting federal judges who have played roles in connection with the prosecution of former Alabama Governor Don Siegelman. The quartet consists of U.W. Clemons, a judge in Birmingham who dismissed the first proceedings against Siegelman with prejudice and went out of his way to suggest he suspected inappropriate conduct on the part of prosecutors. Clemons is the only Democratic appointee among the judges. And, as the case unfolds, I firmly believe that all of Clemons’ suspicions will be fully validated.
Don Siegelman, Alabama Governor, Roved by Politicized US Attorneys | 8 comments (8 topical, 0 hidden)
Don Siegelman, Alabama Governor, Roved by Politicized US Attorneys | 8 comments (8 topical, 0 hidden)
|
Support ePluribus Media -- Support Citizen Powered Journalism! recent commentaries
front page
Tuesday November 27th
Monday November 26th
|