Subscribe to ePluribus Media



ePluribus Media Store


Want Headlines via Email?
Enter your email address:


Help Save 1.800.SUICIDE


Civil Rights Justices -- The real Scandal behind the US Attorneys

by rcs1

The opinion editorial, Bush's long history of tilting Justice, in the Los Angeles Times tonight (8:30 pm PDT) by career (35 years) civil rights law attorney Joseph Rich pretty much completes the picture of the extent of the Bush Administration's attempts to corrupt and corrode the law of the land.

According to the writer, The Bush Administration's Department of Justice

has notably shirked its legal responsibility to protect voting rights. From 2001 to 2006, no voting discrimination cases were brought on behalf of African American or Native American voters. U.S. attorneys were told instead to give priority to voter fraud cases, which, when coupled with the strong support for voter ID laws, indicated an intent to depress voter turnout in minority and poor communities.

And indeed, two of the U.S. Attorneys who were fired (Mckay and Inglesias), were fired in part because they refused to use their office to continue the Bush policy of voter disenfranchisement -- and we are not talking about the long lines, the two few machines, the lock down on voter recounts because of terrorist threats in Ohio. Instead, we are talking about a systematic, planned process of shutting out the poor and middleclass.

In Missouri, an acting interim U.S. Attorney Brad Schlozman was installed after the Patriot Act Reauthorization, thus side stepping any Senate confirmation process:

Missouri had one of the closest Senate races in the country last November, and a week before the election, Schlozman brought four voter fraud indictments against members of an organization representing poor and minority people. This blatantly contradicted the department's long-standing policy to wait until after an election to bring such indictments because a federal criminal investigation might affect the outcome of the vote. The timing of the Missouri indictments could not have made the administration's aims more transparent.

The LA Times bio of the writer reads:  "Joseph D. Rich, was chief of the voting section in the Justice Department's civil right division from 1999 to 2005. He now works for the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law."

To understand why Schlozman was the "right man" for this job, but had to be snuck in the back door of the Pat Act Reauthorization, you need to read the entire piece. Even if you thought you couldn't ever be more outraged by what this administration has done, you will be.

In the last two years, 55% to 60% of attorneys in the voting section have transferred to other departments or left the Justice Department entirely.
Hat Tip to Standingup.

commentary :: :: :: buzz-it!
Display:
make Nixon look as if he were playing patty cake.

by Cho on Thu Mar 29, 2007 at 11:20:17 PM EST
My Mom always uses this quaint old phrase to describe a party determined to his/her own way by any means possible.  It certainly fits this lot.  I am struck by the brazen shedding of subterfuge lately in the open ridicule of the voter.  I have seen multiple references to the lack of wisdom in letting the people determine policy and policymakers. Yesterday, I was struck by a headline that asked "Should Public Schools Be Abolished?" and the article answered the query in the affirmative.

So--to keep a "permanent Republican majority",we start by eliminating the vote, we do away with democracy, then education so the plebes don't even THINK about voting. It IS the Middle Ages again.

by DEFuning on Fri Mar 30, 2007 at 07:38:03 AM EST

...by looking at the Republican PAC's dedicated to their majority.

Gee, the first one we already know is bad news:

ARMPAC    Americans for a Republican Majority

But who donated to the rest of these PAC's, and how are they shaping the vote in 2008?

BAMPAC    Building a Majority PAC

CAMPAC    Continuing a Majority Party PAC

FARM PAC    For Americas Republican Majority PAC

KOMPAC    Keep Our Majority PAC

REFORM PAC    Re-Elect Freshman of the Republican Majority

Once one does a little digging into these PAC's, it's pretty clear that one of the ways they intended to win and keep a majority was with good old-fashioned cash.  But look at the damage the folks who've donated to these PAC's have done...

by RayneToday on Fri Mar 30, 2007 at 05:44:59 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Don't forget how Bush overloaded the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights with Republicans... this was at least a two-pronged attack on voting rights.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
by wanderindiana on Fri Mar 30, 2007 at 07:53:08 AM EST
Glad you remembered that one.  More than a two-pronged attack from what I'm seeing.  

by standingup on Fri Mar 30, 2007 at 10:07:34 AM EST
[ Parent ]
On the first prong, there are more U.S. Attorneys who've left under myterious circumstances, and some of them surely were strong civil rights proponents.

Jeffrey Collins, U.S. Attorney for Eastern Michigan District, stepped down for "private sector" position.  Collins, a former Michigan Appeals Court Judge, left his position only months (weeks?) after the USDOJ filed two consent decrees closing the USDOJ's pattern or practice investigation into the Detroit Police Department.  Collins was the second African-American U.S. Attorney in Michigan as well.

Collins did not make even half of his 4 year term, and left well before the election, in August of 2004.

by RayneToday on Fri Mar 30, 2007 at 05:58:17 PM EST
[ Parent ]

From our post Unravelling the spin - US Attorney firing justifications:

4. Todd Graves resigned from the Western District of Missouri on March 24, 2006. Bradley Schlozman was the first Attorney General appointment made by Gonzales on March 24, 2006 to fill a vacancy under the changes to the interim appointment that were signed into law March 9, 2006. John Woods was nominated by the president to replace Graves on January 16, 2007.

And McClatchy's article from one week ago:

Bradley Schlozman, who was the civil rights division's deputy chief, agreed in 2005 to reverse the career staff's recommendations to challenge a Georgia law that would have required voters to pay $20 for photo IDs and in some cases travel as far as 30 miles to obtain the ID card.

A federal judge threw out the Georgia law, calling it an unconstitutional, Jim Crow-era poll tax.

In an interview, Schlozman, who was named interim U.S. attorney in Kansas City in November 2005, said he merely affirmed a subordinate's decision to overturn the career staff's recommendations.

He said it was "absolutely not true" that he drove out career lawyers. "What I tried to do was to depoliticize the hiring process," Schlozman said. "We hired people across the political spectrum."



by standingup on Fri Mar 30, 2007 at 10:06:06 AM EST
I was told that the police breaking into my house with out a warrant was not a Large enough case.  By the ACLU so it never even reached an AG.

Culture changes with the tide, they are not bringing cases, so no one defends you if your rights are violated

by OnePissedOffDemocrat on Sun Apr 01, 2007 at 06:41:09 AM EST


Terrorism supersedes hate crimes, police abuse...
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/national/313178_fbicivilrights26.html

by avahome on Thu Apr 26, 2007 at 01:28:12 PM EST

Support ePluribus Media -- Support Citizen Powered Journalism!

ePluribus Media

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

members


community front page

make a new account


Username:
Password:

create account | faq | search | community front page |