Subscribe to ePluribus Media



ePluribus Media Store


Want Headlines via Email?
Enter your email address:


Help Save 1.800.SUICIDE


Two of the Gonzales Seven Step Down Today -- Daniel Bogden & David Iglesias

by rcs1

[editor's note, by standingup] Updates added

Today, the last two of the Gonzales 7 will step down -- Daniel Bogden in Nevada and David Iglesias in New Mexico. Attorney Gonzales will be announcing acting/interim replacements in both U.S. Attorney districts as there have been no Presidential nominations for either district.

The five other U.S. Attorneys -- asked to resign on December 7th, 2006 as part of what has become known as the 'Pearl Harbor massacre' of the Gonzales Seven (Lam, Ryan, Charlton, Cummins and McKay) -- have already left their posts.

ePluribus Media has compiled background stories on each of these seven -- The Gonzales Seven: Who They are and Who is Replacing Them -- which are available on the ePluribus Media Journal.


commentary :: :: :: buzz-it!
Duke Falconer writes in the ePluribus Media Spotlight article on Iglesias:
Ironically, of the seven US Attorneys purged by Alberto Gonzales last December, David C. Iglesias of New Mexico, who has received little attention in the press, is perhaps the most famous of the group...but most people just don't know it. While a Navy JAG officer in 1986 he was the defense counsel in a Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, court-martial of two men accused of assaulting a fellow Marine. Iglesias, and his defense in that case, later became the inspiration for the movie, "A Few Good Men."
Iglesias has announced a press conference for later today. Stay tuned. Bodgen, also stepping down today, was the subject of an ePluribus Media spotlight article three weeks ago that looked at what Bodgen was investigating. Full stories on each of the seven are available The Gonzales Seven: Who They are and Who is Replacing Them It is now generally accepted that the seven were asked to resign because the Bush Administration desires shifts in the direction of prosecution. Speculation has ranged from these new policy directions as:
  • Federal enforcement of capital punishment (Charlton)
  • Less focus on Republican political corruption (Lam)
  • More focus on "opposition" investigation into Democrats (Cummins, McKay)
  • More prosecution and focus on illegals (Lam, Iglesias)
In addition to the original Gonzales Seven asked to resign on Pearl Harbor Day, 2006, Margaret Chiara, U.S. Attorney for the Western District of Michigan, was a latecomer to the party. She announced her resignation Febuary 23 and Dan Eggen reported she was the 8th to be fired:
An eighth U.S. attorney announced her resignation yesterday, the latest in a wave of forced departures of federal prosecutors who have clashed with the Justice Department over the death penalty and other issues. ... Sources familiar with the case confirmed that she was among a larger group of prosecutors who were first asked to resign Dec. 7.

Update [2007-2-28 14:44:58 by ePluribus Media]: The AP (via Santa Fe New Mexican) has a report on the Iglesias news conference today.
Deputy Attorney General Paul J. McNulty told the Senate Judiciary Committee earlier this month that most of the U.S. attorneys had been fired for "performance-related" reasons. But Iglesias said he called his news conference Wednesday to present evidence that's "demonstrably untrue" for his office. He displayed charts of statistics showing the number of defendants charged during his 5 1/2-year tenure rose 13 percent and immigration cases increased 78 percent. At the same time, the caseload of his assistant U.S. attorneys went up 24 percent, while the number of full-time employees in the office went up just 7 percent. ... He said he still feels "hugely disappointed" by his ouster. But he refused to criticize the Justice Department or the Bush administration and said he would testify before Congress about the issue only under subpoena.
Also, a piece by Marisa Taylor of McClatchy on Iglesias stepping down Political interference alleged in sacking of a U.S. attorney.
Two months later, on Dec. 7, Iglesias became one of six U.S. attorneys ordered to step down for what administration officials have termed "performance-related issues." Two other U.S. attorneys also have been asked to resign.

Iglesias, who received a positive performance review before he was fired, said he suspected he was forced out because of his refusal to be pressured to hand down an indictment in the ongoing probe.

"I believe that because I didn't play ball, so to speak, I was asked to resign," said Iglesias, who officially stepped down Wednesday.


Update [2007-2-28 16:2:58 by ePluribus Media]: Josh Marshall picking up from the McClatchy article:
Now, when Iglesias had his news conference this morning, McClatchy reports that he said that "two members of Congress separately called in mid October to inquire about the timing of an ongoing probe of a kickback scheme and appeared eager for an indictment to be issued on the eve of the elections in order to benefit the Republicans." Iglesias wouldn't name those members of Congress. But we want to know who they are.
And Paul Kiel is tracking down members of the New Mexico Congressional delegation to find out who made the calls. He has two responses posted so far at TPMuckraker.



Update [2007-2-28 17:3:44 by ePluribus Media]: Ellicatt in the comments reports:
Feinstein, Schumer and Whitehouse, in the past hour on the Senate floor, all spoke of this issue and specifically talked about the AP article, Iglesias, and Carol Lam's (sp?) firings. They talked about how Iglesias was contacted by two congressmen who wanted Iglesias to hand down an indictment against a Democrat the evening before the November election, and Iglesias refused to do it. Schumer relayed that his office was contacted regarding this situation and was told that Iglesias was willing to testify, but would do it under subpoena.

They also brought up that one of the appointees was closely aligned with Rove, and had a job that basically amounted to doing "dirt research" on democratic candidates. In their opinion, this man is not qualified to have received this appointment.

They were told by Alberto Gonzales that these new appointments were made to (paraphrasing) best serve the American public with the best available resources.

They are determined to get to the bottom of this, and they perceive the situation to be absolutely politically motivated.

TPMuckraker also is now reporting that Sen. Feinstein and Sen. Schumer both spoke on the Senate floor this afternoon and called for subpoenas to be issued to the fired U.S. Attorneys.


Update [2007-2-28 20:35:11 by standingup]: Democrats on the House Judiciary Committee have joined in seeking testimony from some of the fired U.S. Attorneys. The Associated Press is reporting:
A House subcommittee is slated to vote Thursday on subpoenas for four of the eight dismissed U.S. attorneys. The Senate Judiciary Committee, meanwhile, will send letters to those fired before voting next week on compelling their testimony, according to officials with both panels. The prosecutors have privately told both committees that they would not testify voluntarily but would honor a congressional subpoena, according to Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., and an official close to the House subcommittee on commercial and administrative law. House subcommittee Chairwoman Linda Sanchez said her panel will vote on subpoenas for fired prosecutors Carol Lam of San Diego, David Iglesias of New Mexico, H.E. "Bud" Cummins of Arkansas and John McKay of Washington.

Over the last several weeks ePluribus Media has brought you several stories:
Previous ePluribus Media stories on the U.S. Attorneys: Here are some links to fact checked articles on the ePluribus Media Journal: On the ePluribus Media Community, check out these commentaries:
Many many contributors: Avahome, kfred, standingup, JeninRI, biblio, cho, roxy, wanderindiana, GreyHawk, Chris White, luaptifer, Rayne Today, Connecticut Man 1, Aaron Barlow, Bronxdem, Timroff, Duke1676, clammyc; on Kos: The Maven, Dc Pol Sci, macdust, carolita, MarkeTrustee, The Fat Lady Sings, madgranny, ellicatt

Please let us know of any one we may have missed.


If you like what ePMedia's been doing with research, reviews and interviews, please consider donating to help with our efforts.

Display:
Please recommend if you are so inclined The U.S. Attorneys -- Bogden and Iglesias stepping down.

by Cho on Wed Feb 28, 2007 at 11:48:10 AM EST
story is up on their site, linked below in "daily news".

by rba on Wed Feb 28, 2007 at 12:33:14 PM EST
Those guys in the Washington Bureau have been so terrific on this story -- especially Marisa Taylor, who's been following this from the get go.

by Cho on Wed Feb 28, 2007 at 01:00:28 PM EST
[ Parent ]

You have got it on the Rec List.

These days it is an achievement on DKos - although such an important piece of work should not need this special accolade, it deserves this greater awareness.

by Welshman on Wed Feb 28, 2007 at 12:49:55 PM EST

to check out the Spotlights on the Journal, but Roxy, Standingup, Avahome and Kfred did an unbelievable job pulling together stories on each one of the Seven...with photos and news reports.  Duke Falconer, Tim Smith, Amy Griel, and Adam Lambert all contributed their awesome writing skills... It's a real testimony to collaboration and plain old sweat!

by Cho on Wed Feb 28, 2007 at 12:58:19 PM EST
[ Parent ]

I am blaming your publishing on DKos for my missing the post so I have not been able to return my two rental DVDs and get two replacements for the weekend.

So now I am stuck half way through the multi-part series of Bronowski's wonderful BBC programmes of many years ago called "The Ascent of Man".

Tsk, ePluribus. the timing of your posts is hopeless  :) With you all not being on GMT, it is worse than living in Ohio (It is that State that is one of those that has split time isn't it?)

You asked me the other day,  Cho, if I would help out around the place a bit more. You will have seen that my post on DKos, had at least one typed repetition of a word and the leaving out altogether a vital preposition! I promise to get my cataract seen to this Spring. Until then checking anything and doing any volunteering is hopeless.

by Welshman on Wed Feb 28, 2007 at 01:46:34 PM EST

everything you do here honors us... thank you.

And I think the state is Indiana... but we will have to ask wanderindiana... which may be why he wanders!

by Cho on Wed Feb 28, 2007 at 01:58:24 PM EST
[ Parent ]

..tongue in cheek comments, I'll do one.

Does the statement "If you like what ePMedia's been doing with research, reviews and interviews, please consider donating to help with our efforts." bring in donations from those who don't comment on here?

If it doesn't, it is a statement that many will find off-putting. Never tell the possible client what the cost of your product is until they have begun to appreciate its value. First invite them join your work here, get them committed to ePluribus and then try and sting 'em for donations. I fell for it this way round!

by Welshman on Wed Feb 28, 2007 at 02:09:13 PM EST
[ Parent ]

So the sign off should be ... Come visit us...
(not come give us money)

Am I understanding your excellent marketing advice correctly?

by Cho on Wed Feb 28, 2007 at 03:04:24 PM EST
[ Parent ]

..asking for money (unless it has been shown to work from those with whom we are trying to get to come across for the first time and support the site).

What are our unique selling points that distinguishes us from DKos, MLW, Booman etc? I think we know these, and we also know that these other sites share the same strength with each other that is different from ours.

It is these different distinguishing features that we should push in our sign offs. Asking for donations before we have sold these concepts simply on the basis of, say, the one diary that a "newbie" has seen from us, however well researched and written, is a bit ambitious, but you might tell me that the response you get is proving me wrong.

The great thing though is that we are all getting onto DKos with our ePluribus slogans in our sigs. This will get people curious and start to come across.

I hope that I am not being impertinent in making these affectionate comments?

by Welshman on Wed Feb 28, 2007 at 04:04:46 PM EST
[ Parent ]

These are great! and so helpful... as avahome always says, it takes a village... all of us contributing our best talents and skills.

I think ePMedia folk in general are somewhat shy, reclusive types, who like to be sure of our data and research...(although, what the heck do I know really??)...but definitely dedicated to quality, truth and writing.

Dang, Welshman, your ideas are so helpful, more please.

by Cho on Wed Feb 28, 2007 at 04:12:10 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Immediately on writing this homily on winning friends and influencing people, a post when up on DKos:

Speak up, man! Say: PLEASE DONATE

Instead of

>>If you like what ePMedia's been doing with research, reviews and interviews, please consider donating to help with our efforts.

You do NEED $, yes?!

I'm donating now.

Damn funny...and damn excellent!

I have a multi-multi-billion dollar profitable lesson through which I was shown by the chairman of the company for which I worked that to be successful in the States, we had to have our brilliantly researched products marketed by yourselves and not us - no matter how much the up front cost was.

I guess I never learnt - but then I was only in charge of human resources and not expected to know these things   :)

(I'm presuming LNK is new to us and not simply an old friend - otherwise I stick by my guns!!)

by Welshman on Wed Feb 28, 2007 at 04:27:54 PM EST
[ Parent ]

but you are still still, never impertinent.
Very big grin!

by Cho on Wed Feb 28, 2007 at 04:38:52 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Noting that he was a political appointee, Iglesias said, "I don't mind being treated like a political piñata.  But I do take umbrage that my office, hard working career people who are not political, are being tarred with the same brush."

Iglesias says he's never been given a reason for his ouster:  "Let's just set the record straight.  I'm moved out for political reasons.  I don't know what those political reasons are and I'm okay with that."

He acknowledged, but refused to elaborate on, a quip included in an email to an acquaintance in which he described himself as the victim of a "political fragging."  The comment surfaced on the political blog of New Mexico political consultant Joe Monahan.


from here

by roxy317 on Wed Feb 28, 2007 at 02:23:59 PM EST
[new] Speak up, man! Say: PLEASE DONATE (0 / 0)

Instead of

>>If you like what ePMedia's been doing with research, reviews and interviews, please consider donating to help with our efforts.

You do NEED $, yes?!
I'm donating now.

by LNK on Wed Feb 28, 2007 at 12:35:17 PM PST

That means we are doing our job!

by roxy317 on Wed Feb 28, 2007 at 03:40:34 PM EST



by Cho on Wed Feb 28, 2007 at 04:14:32 PM EST
[ Parent ]

O.K. O.K.  So my British reticence in asking for money up front was wrong. I DO get the message without my daftness being spread throughout the thread for everybody to see, you know!

:)   :)

by Welshman on Wed Feb 28, 2007 at 05:00:40 PM EST
[ Parent ]

...I am pretty reticence in asking for money up front, too.  Just ask Aaron, we had this discussion today with our Columbia Journalism school coach...

Dang it, I hate it when I am wrong and there I was thinking... see Welshman gets it, he's right, therefore, I am right...

Oh no... did I say "right"?

by Cho on Wed Feb 28, 2007 at 05:04:23 PM EST
[ Parent ]

in fact I agree with your suggestions on the "don't applaud just throw money" thing.

by roxy317 on Wed Feb 28, 2007 at 05:05:27 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Schumer quoted Marisa Taylor's piece on Iglesias, and added that his staff had talked to him the day prior to his call declining to prosecute.  So far looks like Leahy is inclined to issue subpoenas for all fired for a Judiciary Cmte hearing - soon.

We'll see.

by rba on Wed Feb 28, 2007 at 03:59:16 PM EST

I won't talk unless you subpoena me -- what a clear call and direction for action.

by Cho on Wed Feb 28, 2007 at 04:13:42 PM EST
[ Parent ]
They are going to subpoena!...

from ellicat's post on kos:

the past hour on the Senate floor, all spoke of this issue and specifically talked about the AP article, Iglesias, and Carol Lam's (sp?) firings.  They talked about how Iglesias was contacted by two congressmen who wanted Iglesias to hand down an indictment against a Democrat the evening before the November election, and Iglesias refused to do it.  Schumer relayed that his office was contacted regarding this situation and was told that Iglesias was willing to  testify, but would do it under subpoena.

They also brought up that one of the appointees was closely aligned with Rove, and had a job that basically amounted to doing "dirt research" on democratic candidates.  In their opinion, this man is not qualified to have received this appointment.

They were told by Alberto Gonzales that these new appointments were made to (paraphrasing) best serve the American public with the best available resources.

They are determined to get to the bottom of this, and they perceive the situation to be absolutely politically motivated.



by Cho on Wed Feb 28, 2007 at 04:53:38 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I should have been more clear:  according to Schumer, Leahy feels that - in this rare case - subpoenas would be justified.

by rba on Wed Feb 28, 2007 at 05:06:07 PM EST
[ Parent ]
or lose it ;-)  The people voted for oversight in 2006.  I would think its justified in this case.  

by standingup on Wed Feb 28, 2007 at 05:43:35 PM EST
[ Parent ]
28th February, 2007
Menai Marina
Y Felinheli
Gwynedd, UK

Dear Avahome, kfred, rayne today, standingup, JeninRI, cho, roxy, wanderindiana, GreyHawk, biblio, Chris White, luaptifer, Rayne Today, Connecticut Man 1, Aaron Barlow, Bronxdem, timroff,duke1676,clammyc; on Kos: The Maven, Dc Pol Sci, macdust, carolita, MarkeTrustee, The Fat Lady Sings, madgranny

________________

I am writing to say that this is among the best work that you have done. Congratulations.

If I could make a suggestion. Could one or two of you produce a pro-forma e-mail that Kossacks could send to their representatives in Congress and a draft LTE for their newspapers?

I then promise to hold clammyc's feet to the fire to get out one of his fiery diaries on DKos so that it is brought to the attention of everyone for their action in a couple of day's time.

It should, of course, acknowledge the work in the floor of the Congress that was done today, that was mentioned in the great updates to your diary.

Indeed, why write if it is already being worked on by your Representatives? Because nothing pleases them more than to have their work recognised and nothing inspires them more to continue than knowing that its importance is felt by those whom they represent.

It is lovely to sit here quietly looking out at the dark squalls rushing up the Menai Straits with nothing better to do than idly applaud from the sidelines the real workers on this board.

But seriously folks, all of you, well done. It was over three years ago that I first read the huge Eurolegal write up on what was being done over the last decade to your judiciary and I despaired that it would ever get the attention that the high profile appointments to the Supreme Court were getting. It is a great compliment to your eye for detail and the apparent obscure that has allowed you to pick this up and make it so visible.

Again, congratulations on a fine day's work.

Yours sincerely

Keith Barratt.

(And, P.S. Sally the Psycho Dog thinks you are a class act as well).

by Welshman on Wed Feb 28, 2007 at 05:44:02 PM EST

thank you from the bottom of our hearts...

It all started with a little email in early January from that energizer bunny Avahome... and the epistle started:  "Hey guys, this is something that is sticking in my craw..."

by Cho on Wed Feb 28, 2007 at 06:57:24 PM EST
[ Parent ]

and maybe even Sally the Psycho Dog's too:
A House subcommittee is slated to vote Thursday on subpoenas for four of the eight dismissed U.S. attorneys. The Senate Judiciary Committee, meanwhile, will send letters to those fired before voting next week on compelling their testimony, according to officials with both panels.

The prosecutors have privately told both committees that they would not testify voluntarily but would honor a congressional subpoena, according to Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., and an official close to the House subcommittee on commercial and administrative law.

House subcommittee Chairwoman Linda Sanchez said her panel will vote on subpoenas for fired prosecutors Carol Lam of San Diego, David Iglesias of New Mexico, H.E. "Bud" Cummins of Arkansas and John McKay of Washington.




by Cho on Wed Feb 28, 2007 at 08:58:51 PM EST
[ Parent ]
The Wall Street Journal (subscription) reported last week that prosecutors in Arizona charged that their superiors in Washington slowed their investigation and that the prosecutors suspected it was because the superiors wanted Renzi to win re-election. Conflicts between U.S. attorneys' offices and the Criminal Division typically stem from routine disagreements regarding the law and the strategy for handling an investigation.

But Charlton's firing, the delay in the Renzi investigation, and disclosures about the role of the White House in the firings of U.S. attorneys has created a climate where suspicions abound among career prosecutors, a senior Justice Department official said in an interview.

"Under ordinary circumstances, with something like the Renzi case," the official said, "everyone would assume that this was just an honest disagreement between a U.S. attorney and main Justice. But the presumption in the current environment is that everybody's motives are suspect-and for good reason. There really has to be a housecleaning and a coming clean to Congress, the public, but perhaps most of all, the rank-and-file line prosecutors."



by Cho on Mon Apr 30, 2007 at 11:46:56 PM EST

Support ePluribus Media -- Support Citizen Powered Journalism!

ePluribus Media

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

members


community front page

make a new account


Username:
Password:

create account | faq | search | community front page |