Subscribe to ePluribus Media



ePluribus Media Store


Want Headlines via Email?
Enter your email address:


Help Save 1.800.SUICIDE


Unravelling the spin - US Attorney firing justifications

by rcs1

February 22, over at TPM Josh Marshall continued poking holes in the Administration’s official justification for the unprecedented spate of US attorney firings suggesting that they were just a cover for the firing of Lam:
As per Washington conventional wisdom we're now supposed to accept that the firing of seven US attorneys around the country was, yes, perhaps unprecedented, but more an example of Bush cronyism than an effort to short-circuit one or more investigations.

We were originally told that she was let go on the basis of poor performance and management. But McClatchy later reported that, like other fired US attorneys, Lam's performance reviews were strong.

We're now asked to believe that she was canned because a few conservative congressmen were complaining that she wasn't doing enough on the illegal immigration front.


commentary :: :: :: buzz-it!
So, was it poor performance and management? Doesn’t seem to be. Poor priorities? Again, seems far-fetched. Or was it the result of another justification that’s been floated? Pure old-fashioned politics…
One administration official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity in discussing personnel issues, said the spate of firings was the result of "pressure from people who make personnel decisions outside of Justice who wanted to make some things happen in these places." Washington Post, February 4

Suppose the firings were truly old fashioned politics and the Bush Administration decided to exercise its legal right to remove sitting US Attorneys to appease people “outside of Justice” by placing party loyalists into these resume-enhancing positions. Why then, did the Administration choose to fire sitting US Attorneys, rather than appoint individuals to any of the then current openings? The following list includes some of the Districts that did not have a presidentially nominated U.S. Attorney when the phone calls were made December 7 to fire six U.S. Attorneys.

  1. First Assistant U.S. Attorney Charles T. Miller of the Southern District of West Virginia became the Acting U.S. attorney when Kasey Warner resigned suddenly August 2, 2005. Mr. Miller's 210 day term expired under the Vacancies Reform Act in February 2006. He was then appointed by Attorney General Gonzales to be the Interim U.S. Attorney. Miller continues to serve as Interim and can do so indefinately under the changes made in the Patriot Reauthorization Act of 2005.
  2. The Eastern District of Tennessee has been without a presidentially nominated U.S. Attorney since October 24, 2005 when Harry Mattice became United States District Judge for the district. James R. "Russ" Dedrick became Acting US Attorney following Mattice’s departure in 2005 and remains Interim U.S. Attorney for the district. No presidential nomination for this district has been submitted.
  3. The Southern District of Illinois has been without a presidentially nominated U.S. Attorney since Ronald Tenpas left to become Associate Deputy Attorney General in the DOJ on November 21, 2005. Edward McNally had a high profile 120-day interim term and was replaced by Randy Massey on March 21, 2006 who remains there as the acting U.S. attorney. The president nominated Phillip Green to replace Tenpas on June 9 but the nomination was returned when the 109th Congress adjourned in December 2006. The president has not resubmitted Mr. Green's nomination as of this date.
  4. Todd Graves resigned from the Western District of Missouri on March 24, 2006. Bradley Schlozman was the first Attorney General appointment made by Gonzales on March 24, 2006 to fill a vacancy under the changes to the interim appointment that were signed into law March 9, 2006. John Woods was nominated by the president to replace Graves on January 16, 2007.
  5. The Middle District of Tennessee has been without a presidentially nominated U.S. Attorney since James Vines departure on October 1, 2006. Craig Morford, formerly First Assistant United States Attorney in the Northern District of Ohio, was appointed by Attorney General Gonzales on October 2, 2006. Ed Yarbrough, a Nashville criminal defense attorney, was reported to be under consideration for the nomination in October 2006, but to date, no announcement has been made.

So, if the Administration was looking for positions to place valued loyalists, there were multiple open districts. Some vacant for more than a year.

Display:
Isn't there some speculation going around that most of the other firings were actually just a means to hide the Lam firing? That is, Lam was the only target but to make it look like business as usual they sacrificed a number of other attorneys.

If this is really the case, then isn't it quite likely that the firing of Lam is tied into the Cunningham case? And that the unidentified party who wanted her fired is in all probability a Defense Contractor who is trying to scuttle getting caught.

All of which, if true, really points to the Cunningham case being much much much worse than it  already appears.

by susie dow on Fri Feb 23, 2007 at 05:14:33 PM EST

There has been speculation that the group firings were an attempt to hide or distract from Lam's firing.  Josh had a post on it yesterday on TPM.  It was in and then we took it out, mostly because of the speculation. This piece was just to add another little bit of information discovered when going back through all of the U.S. Districts, who was there and in what capacity.  There may even be reasons that some of those districts we listed did have a permanent U.S. Attorney in place.  

I sense there is a real possibility they wanted Lam out.  But I don't think that is the sole reason for the firings.  I also doubt it's as big as a grand conspiracy as some would want it to be.  My best guess is that it's somewhere in the middle and a little more complex or less easy to pin down to one or two reasons.  

It wouldn't surprise me that the Cunningham case has the potential to snare some more high profile people.  It could be much, much worse than they ever wanted us to know.  

by standingup on Fri Feb 23, 2007 at 06:03:55 PM EST
[ Parent ]

to be more questions than answers where these US Attorneys are concerned ... and the list just keeps growing.

by roxy317 on Fri Feb 23, 2007 at 06:36:08 PM EST
[ Parent ]
called Gonzales regarding placing Griffin in Arkansas......... does that not seem odd to anyone?
Harriet Miers was(is) GW's left hand?  Did GW ask her to recommend Griffin unbeknownst to Karl?  I don't think in any way Karl wants publicity on himself....nor any light shown that he is involved.
But when GW goes out on his own(thinks for himself) *hit happens!!!!!!

by avahome on Fri Feb 23, 2007 at 10:09:04 PM EST
[ Parent ]
ever started thinking for himself, we'd be able to smell the smoke in Honolulu!

Harriet may have made the recommendation, but not without Karl's fore-knowlege.  

by roxy317 on Fri Feb 23, 2007 at 10:13:18 PM EST
[ Parent ]

a baby face!!!!!! Oh My!

by avahome on Fri Feb 23, 2007 at 10:19:46 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Following Paul Krugman's NYT op-ed today, this list deserves another look-see.

Believe that there are more that need followup, but from a different perspective.  What was going on in each of the districts to which these folks were appointed?  Was there an election-related purpose?

Eid, Troy    R    CO
Griffin, Tim    R    AR
Paulose, Rachel    R    MN
Taylor, Jeff    R    DC
Wood, John    R    KS
Rhodes, Deborah    R    AL
Acosta, Alexander    R    FL
Richter, John    R    OK
Massey, Randy    R    IL-S
McNally, Edward    R    IL-S
Dummermuth, Matt    R    IA
Mattice, Harry    R    TN-E
Dedrick, James Russ    R    TN-E
Scholzman, Bradley    R    MO-W
Morford, Craig    ?    TN-M

This thing is huge. Ginormous.

by RayneToday on Fri Mar 09, 2007 at 10:54:05 AM EST

That's the original list, I believe, that Marisa Taylor published at McClatchy Washington Bureau back in the middle of January!  

by Cho on Fri Mar 09, 2007 at 11:39:19 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Support ePluribus Media -- Support Citizen Powered Journalism!

ePluribus Media

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

members


community front page

make a new account


Username:
Password:

create account | faq | search | community front page |