![]() |
||
|
|
by
Sat Nov 10, 2007 at 05:49:55 PM EST
Crossposted from DailyKos, in full with permisson of the Author, TomP
The news Saturday was that, after first denying it to the Grinnell Student Newspaper, Senator Clinton's Campaign admits planting questions in audiences this week and handpicking the questioners.
The Clinton campaign has admitted to planting questions in Iowa. They have confirmed that a campaign staffer approached a student to ask Sen. Clinton a question about global warming during a campaign stop at a biodiesel plant in Newton, Iowa, on Nov. 6. The Edwards campaign had this to say:
"In light of a weak debate performance, not to mention a persistent inability to answer the tough questions, it appears the Clinton campaign has adopted a new strategy of planting questions," John Edwards' Communications Director Chris Kofinis said. This goes hand in hand with the Politics of Parsing. Come around after the fold for more on this developing story. commentary :: :: :: buzz-it!
Apparently, this is not a first for the Clinton campaign. It may be something done routinely by the Clinton Campaign:
Another Plant Attempt Revealed
JOHN EDWARDS ON CLINTON'S PLANTING: Edwards, in a press conference after his speech to the Farmers' Union, hit Hillary for planting a question at an Iowa event.
"That's what George does: George Bush goes to events that are staged where people are screened," he said. "That's not the way democracy works in Iowa." You may remember when an an Iowan asked Clinton why she voted for Kyl-Lieberman and she verbally berated him as a "plant" from another campaign.
Friday afternoon brought a report that her campaign is planting some of her questions. Maybe that's why she assumed the Iran question was a plant?
On Tuesday Nov. 6, the Clinton campaign stopped at a biodiesel plant in Newton as part of a weeklong series of events to introduce her new energy plan. The event was clearly intended to be as much about the press as the Iowa voters in attendance, as a large press core helped fill the small venue. Reporters from many major national news outlets came to the small Iowa town, from such media giants as The New York Times, Los Angeles Times, Senator Clinton must have been afraid of real questions from the audience.
At first the Clinton campaign denied it to the Grinnell newspaper:
But the Clinton campaign also denied the practice of planting. But late last night the Clinton Campaign came clean:
The Clinton campaign has admitted to planting questions in Iowa. They have John Edwards takes any questions:
When asked if the John Edwards campaign employed such practices, I wonder how long this has been going on? How many questions were planted? Remember Yearly Kos? A few people who attended her session told me that it looked like the questioneers were pre-selected at her break out session. I went to John Edwards' session. Those questions definitely came from real Kossaks and Edwards took whatever was asked. Why does this matter? It's a funny story, but by itself does not mean a lot. Campaigns try to manage their message.
But when one steps back and looks at the Politics of Doubletalk, a pattern emerges: time after time, Clinton muddles her message with evasive non-answers. Now we have a FEMA-like If Senator Clinton cannot handle questions in debates and cannot handle questions from real citizens, her prospects in a general election are less than optimal. Furthermore, her campaign keeps screwing up. The tip kerfluffle never should have happened and then the campaign staff made it worse with conflicting stories: was it on a credit card, was it cash, did it happen at all? And after the Politics of Parsing (TR not pending)(PartI and Part 2), the Clinton campaign should have known better. These are the best operatives money can buy and their ability to contain these problems is poor. Perhaps it's because they have to do so much damage control and work so hard to obscure the candidate's positions? Inevitability, it ain't. People see this and they are noticing. Yesterday, Caucus4Priorities of Iowa, the political arm of Iowans for Sensible Priorites endorsed John Edwards for President. Here's what they said about former Senator Edwards:
Edwards gave an excellent answer," said Huppert. "He said we have to stop buying into their frame which equates spending money on the Pentagon with keeping us safe. He also said we can't have a Democratic candidate who cowers and runs away from this issue." And this about Senator Clinton:
Although Clinton filled out the group's detailed policy questionnaire, she was not among the final two candidates underThe Edwards campaign is right: "It's what the Clinton campaign calls the politics of planting."
Edwards on Clinton's Planting Questions: "That's what George does" | 1 comment (1 topical, 0 hidden)
Edwards on Clinton's Planting Questions: "That's what George does" | 1 comment (1 topical, 0 hidden)
|
Support ePluribus Media -- Support Citizen Powered Journalism! recent commentaries
front page
Tuesday November 27th
Monday November 26th
|