![]() |
||
|
|
by
Tue Oct 30, 2007 at 07:55:27 AM EST
We need to continue the follow-up regarding the dismissed US Attorney debacle. This morning I read about a case: Case dropped against Chinese man accused of selling U.S. technology
October 29, 2007 excerpt:
SAN FRANCISCO, California (AP) -- The Justice Department has dropped all criminal charges against a Chinese national accused of selling technology made by his Silicon Valley employer to a Chinese cruise missile laboratory, court records show. It seems a little odd to me that a case is dropped , expecially when it is about military technology sent to China, or does this make sense? I got curious about who initially handled this case. Follow me below the fold for a look at Kevin Ryan's reasoning. commentary :: :: :: buzz-it!
SAN JOSE MAN INDICTED FOR EXPORTING MISSILE TECHNOLOGY TO CHINA WITHOUT AN EXPORT LICENSE
May 25, 2006 excerpt:
SAN JOSE - United States Attorney Kevin V. Ryan announced that a federal grand jury in San Jose yesterday indicted Yueqiang Chen, a.k.a. Bill Chen, for exporting items without a license for use in the design, development, production, and use of missiles to an end-user in China. Mr. Chen is the General Manager and Chief Representative of Data Physics Corporation in China. Data Physics is a San Jose, California, company engaged in the business of manufacturing and selling signal processing equipment for use in noise and vibration testing, including a line of electro-dynamic shakers, vibration controllers, and dynamic signal analyzers. These items are utilized to test missile vibration. This seems pretty straight up to me. And following are the details of what he was caught doing:
Bill Chen, 45, of San Jose, allegedly exported vibration test and shaker equipment, without a license from the Bureau of Industry and Security, to an end-user in China while knowing that such items would be used in the design, development, production, and use of missiles. According to the indictment, on five different occasions, Mr. Chen, a permanent resident alien of the U.S., knowingly violated Export Administration Regulations as follows: I am left scratching my head here and you'd think for all the trouble of the Grand Jury and the US Attorneys office and probably thousands upon thousands of dollars spent...we'd have an explanation on why this case was dropped. Suppose Kevin Ryan just ticked off the Chinese government? Perhaps time had to pass before the DOJ could let this case ride off slowly into the sunset. Thoughts? Here's some previous commentaries involving Kevin Ryan to refresh memories: USAs: Disruption of Corruption Investigation via Committee? Chiara and Ryan
USA Kevin Ryan's case dismissed - why? | 5 comments (5 topical, 0 hidden)
USA Kevin Ryan's case dismissed - why? | 5 comments (5 topical, 0 hidden)
|
Support ePluribus Media -- Support Citizen Powered Journalism! recent commentaries
front page
Tuesday November 27th
Monday November 26th
|