Subscribe to ePluribus Media



ePluribus Media Store


Want Headlines via Email?
Enter your email address:


Help Save 1.800.SUICIDE


Looking Back on Memphis - Part I - Journalism That Matters

by rcs1

"The bipartisan, nationwide cry of outrage over our media has coalesced into a genuine and superbly organized grassroots movement." -- FCC Comissioner Michael J. Copps

The challenge to (re)define news and journalism and freedom of speech has begun.

3,000+ activists, educators, journalists, policymakers and concerned citizens from nearly every state in the union gathered Jan. 11-14 at Memphis' Cook Convention Center for 2007's National Conference for Media Reform (the Journalism That Matters sessions also met at the historic Cotton Museum).

The air filled with a potent and amusing hum of ideas and exchanges.

And revolution.  (Or was that evolution?)


commentary :: :: :: buzz-it!

One moment I was getting my numbers read by a novice numerologist and having a few words with someone who worked at CNN, and the next I was listening to robust debate on the possible future of journalism and media at Memphis Commercial Appeal Editor Chris Peck's home.

Co-facilitator Peggy Holman (in that lovely purple scarf above), fills the 'Samoan Circle' with its first occupants, Leonard Witt, Geneva Overholser, and Chris Peck.

[W]e used a "Samoan Circle" - a conversation among the whole witnessed by all as people flowed in and out of four chairs in the center of the packed living room.  Heated at times, this opening exploration of what is emerging in the new media landscape set the stage for opening the space the next day to explore:

"Given we are all in this together, what's possible now?"

But the circle didn't spring to life until sundown...

Earlier that day, Bill Densmore, director of The Media Giraffe Project at UMass Amherst, (shown with Peggy Kuhr) got things rolling after introductions.

The goal was to continue talks begun by the principals five years ago, and have  participants (as the brochure states) "come away with a new sense of commitment to their work as journalists and community connectors."

According to Holman, JTM participants represented:

  • 40% print
  • 20% broadcast
  • 20% new media
  • 15% educators
  • 10% media reformers
  • 10% other
  • 75% hailing from the mainstream media

To prepare for the think tank session, members of the group were asked to read a series of springboarding papers (The Next Newsroom: A White Paper for the 21st Century; On Behalf of Journalism: A Manifesto for Change [highly recommend this one]; and Constructing an Open Source Framework for Reinventing Journalism).

JTM organizers also paired us up even before our bags were packed, asking us to conduct phone interviews with one another and then share our notes. The beauty of the exercise was in partnering traditional journalists and educators with media reformers or citizen journalists.

(My interview was with Pam McAllister-Johnson, noted for being the first Black female publisher of a general circulation newspaper in the United States, the Ithaca [N.Y.] Journal. She is currently director of the School of Journalism & Broadcasting at Western Kentucky University.)

David Zeeck (with Overholser), the executive editor and senior vice president of the Tacoma News Tribune, sets the scene as we head to Memphis:

This is the city where inventors developed the modern self-service supermarket (Piggly Wiggly), the drive-in restaurant (Fortune's), the franchise motel (Holiday Inn) and overnight shipping (Fed-Ex), and, not least, perfected the blues (W.C. Handy).

Last week I met here with about 30 others - professors, editors, new-media producers, bloggers and "citizen journalists" - to see if we could continue to invent journalism.

After the opening session, we head over to The Cotton Museum.

The museum was a visually stunning and creative place...

...an historic backdrop to what is still today the home of the largest cash cotton exchange in the world.

Our group received a special welcome by Free Press' Robert McChesney and John Nichols.

Then we made our way to our dinner engagement.

Told by her husband, Chris Peck, to expect first 20, then 30, then 40 strangers, Kate Duignan welcomes Steve Yelvington (below) with what must surely be her trademark smile and the finest of southern hospitality.

Great food and good wine...

...fine company and fine minds.

We arrive full Samoan Circle.

The exchange was heated at times, yet jovial and thought-provoking.

Questions tackled:

  • How does an army of digital camera-wielding citizens effect the newsroom? Should it effect the newsroom? 'The newsroom has left the building...' Think Saddam Hussein hanging, London bombings, Tsunami coverage, Rodney King footage. (Do editors need to hire as many photo journalists? Is there any role for editorial judgement in today's 'record everything' free-for-all?)

  • Has 'journalism' become a dirty word? (Does it imply something old, something institutional? With so many institutions in trouble across-the-board, what does that mean for the work of reporting the news?

  • How best can we best embrace the power of collective intelligence ? (How can you best make use of what people already know or are already doing rather than trying to get them to read what we tell them to read or do what we want them to do?)

  • Can the mainstream media change from within? Can it change unhealthy structures that it has had for decades? (The question can be turned on its head somewhat: Will the traditional news arms be doing revolutionary reporting in the future?)

  • How are today's sources different than those used in the past? (Are citizen contributors tapped only for information, or are they turning around and doing the traditional interview work done solely by reporters in the past? Should they ever be 'cut into' the work of journalism, or just tapped for info?)

  • What motivates the citizen journalist to do their work? (Many of them do their work for free. Why? Why is specialized -- niche -- media becoming more rampant? Is it because more citizens are finding that their needs are not being met?)

  • What can be done to fix the elephant in the room: modern media's economic model? (Does the fact that a handful of corporations control the nation's -- and world's -- media help or hinder a consumer's ability to sort through accumulating data to gain meaning out of the news?)

Above, David Zeeck, Neil Ralston, Bill Densmore, Karen Magnuson, Michael Fancher, and Michael Caputo discuss Minnesota Public Radio's public insight journalism, a database of 20,000 listeners who've made themselves available as background sources to better inform the station's news reporting. (I first heard about PIJ when I participated as a member of ePluribus Media on creator Michael Skoler's panel on the project last summer.)

Happy guests Farley Peters, Beth Lawton, and Aldon Hynes...

...and Esther Thorson and Margaret Duffy by candlelight.

A great evening of hearty laughter and debate.

Day two coming soon...

Display:
Will have more on the way throughout the day.

JTM was an extraordinary event, and I came home quite overwhelmed by all of the great discussions I was a part of. Impressive change is motivated by technology and a bit of worry that no one really knows yet where journalism is ultimately heading.

Exhilerating, yet uneasy times for the industry.

On PTSD Combat | Email list | Book
by ilona on Sun Jan 21, 2007 at 06:47:57 AM EST

...that I was unable to go.  Thanks for giving us this report, makes me feel a little better about not having been able to attend.

by Cho on Sun Jan 21, 2007 at 10:32:06 AM EST
The sessions would have been greatly welcoming of your input (or that of any others doing such great work at ePM). The work that MGP is doing to bring the traditional and new media editors and reporters together at the same table is refreshing and inspiring...

But I'm always my worst critic, and didn't feel my sharpest last week (still exhausted from the book writing and all that went along with finishing it), but everyone was welcoming and the mood and energy of our tight-knight group was special and addictive.

I look forward to participating again, soon. (Planning the next 'meet-up', to be held in early August, is already in the works...)

On PTSD Combat | Email list | Book
by ilona on Sun Jan 21, 2007 at 03:23:51 PM EST
[ Parent ]

get some rest!

by Cho on Sun Jan 21, 2007 at 03:35:17 PM EST
[ Parent ]
We are fortunate to have you there and look forward to reading Part(s) II and as many more as you want to write.  Did you get the sense the atmosphere for discussion and exchange between the regular media and citizen journalists is opening up?  I think we have all felt a palpable tension between the two that can be useful but can also be counterproductive.  

by standingup on Sun Jan 21, 2007 at 11:35:08 AM EST
Yes, I do feel that things are opening up, standingup.

Either out of desire to serve the needs of the community, to attempt to continue reaching for higher standards of journalism, or simply out of worry or fear of being left behind. There is a palpable tension -- and the 'heated debate' the first evening certainly bore that out. But the principals of this group saw the swell as it approached five years ago. Today they all agree the wave is here. The key now is to try to harnass and manage it somewhat and for 'journalism' to keep from getting pulled under or swept away by it.

Of course, there are some media reformers who say they would like to wash the traditional media away entirely. I don't see the value to that model, although I agree reform is necessary.

I may be in the minority, but as I said during my time in the Samoan Circle, I personally have received great help and respect from the mainstream media during my time reporting on combat PTSD. There has been a healthy exchange, a solid back and forth. So, the idea that we as citizens would be better served if the NYTimes of WaPo disappeared, to me, is foolish.

Working together with one another to shape the future that we all want to see is probably the better course, especially considering there are people on the 'inside' willing and wishing to find the opportunities in today's media challenges.

It's very, very heartening to see that there are traditional news editors who are aware that change is necessary; theya re willing to drill down and engage and embrace those of us who are riding in on this new wave. Even greater to a CJ like myself, of course, is the support I receive from journalism collectives like this one.  

The challenge for both is finding a healthy economic model. The media corporation's current economic model is suffocating good research/beat reporting while the nonprofit's economic model limits the amount of journalism that can be created due to lack of resources.

On PTSD Combat | Email list | Book
by ilona on Sun Jan 21, 2007 at 03:47:55 PM EST
[ Parent ]

I am encouraged that there might be a softening of barriers on both sides.  My take is the problem is nearer if not already defined and now it is time for the process of working on a solution.  I make no mistake in thinking that will be a smooth ride but the melding or exchange of ideas amongst all the parties could lead to a more satisfying outcome.  

by standingup on Sun Jan 21, 2007 at 06:30:37 PM EST
[ Parent ]
My write up is here.

by Aldon Hynes on Sun Jan 21, 2007 at 11:35:52 AM EST
...we saw at Media Giraffe in Amherst last summer, the breaking down of the traditional approaches includes even the panel structure of conferences on blogging:

One of my favorite sessions from last year was the group talk at the end... sounding unweilding, it was terrifically inspiring, especially when the younger voices from Rob Williams' project took the mike. (photos from ilona and write up about that here ePluribus Media Giraffe Project: A Great Blend

by Cho on Sun Jan 21, 2007 at 11:42:04 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Reclaim the Media has a very nice site.  The link you have to Women in Media and News isn't working but I found it with no trouble on google.  

by standingup on Sun Jan 21, 2007 at 12:15:10 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I've fixed the link in my blog entry for Women in Media and News.  I've also put up another post with additional thoughts from the Journalism that Matters conference.

by Aldon Hynes on Tue Jan 23, 2007 at 10:14:42 AM EST
[ Parent ]
...I'm still ratcheting up my report that includes your DFA meet-up. Thank you for the invitation to dinner; enjoyed it! Will have more for you, and will send you a link when that's ready.

Cheers!

On PTSD Combat | Email list | Book
by ilona on Sun Jan 21, 2007 at 03:56:41 PM EST
[ Parent ]

The Central Question
Government routinely lies, and so do many corporations. That mysterious commitment to the public good, which once joined Americans from many different classes and positions, seems to have dissolved. Integrity, which simply means being true regardless of consequences to one's own beliefs, seems to have no market value in America today.



by jimstaro on Sun Jan 21, 2007 at 12:01:06 PM EST
What motivates the citizen journalist to do their work? (Many of them do their work for free. Why? Why is specialized -- niche -- media becoming more rampant? Is it because more citizens are finding that their needs are not being met?)

I can say for certain that was the primary reason I started engaging in online forums, and my involvement has progressed from that point.

Did any of the participants who fit the citizen journalist description volunteer personal answers to that question?
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
by wanderindiana on Sun Jan 21, 2007 at 12:19:07 PM EST

...that was why I began heading down this road.

I wasn't satisfied with the coverage and couldn't find the answer to questions I had; so, I jumped in myself. When I was in the Samoan Circle, I did mention that was the reason for my doing what I'm doing today (I never would have imagined two years ago that I'd be reporting on combat PTSD). So, my dissatisfaction with journalism led to my picking it up, too.

As rich of an interchange it was, I did find it interesting that many of the heavy-hitters missed opportunities to ask me more about what exactly I'm doing, and why I'm doing it. There was a sense they already had the answers to that and were more interested in finding ways to use us -- either cooperatively or otherwise -- to strengthen the traditional model of journalism.

Many of the traditional media types seemed more enamored (as I am, too) of what Minnesota Public Radio is doing: public insight journalism (as I expalined in my commentary above). However ground-breaking the PIJ program is, however, the new media types see a major flaw:

Is the traditional media simply interested in 'taking' what they want from its citizens, taking their knowledge for free? Why would that sit well with the citizen? What do they get in return? Some asked if the contributors to the story are named in the resulting article (no; they are merely sources tapped for information)? So, what does a citizen get out of putting his or her name into a database to be simply used like that (many just want to be part of the newsmaking process and that's enough for them)?

But the PIJ project is a far different thing than attempting to tap into or 'use' a citizen journalist doing his or her own reporting and research. New media worries that the traditional media is not willing to share control or power of the newsmaking process -- or recognition --  even if they use CJ sources who are doing high quality journalism.

Some feel "if they (the public) don't trust us trained journalists to deliver good reporting, then why should they trust an untrained citizen journalist?"

I think many of us here have the answer to that...

On PTSD Combat | Email list | Book
by ilona on Sun Jan 21, 2007 at 04:15:38 PM EST
[ Parent ]

When I was working toward my MLS degree I had exposure to the corporate concept of knowledge management. We had someone working for KM at Eli Lilly "explain" it to us in a way that strikes me now as similar to blogging, with the notable exception is that Lilly (or whoever) would own the thoughts placed down in written form, electronically or not.

They didn't just want the products of their employees' skills; they wanted to own their thought processes, as well.

I remember myself as being one of a small handful who immediately saw the darker side of this practice they were trying to implement.

What I saw there, and what I increasingly see in corporate journalism, is capitalism disguised as civic collaboration: i.e., the news corporations want to profit from your civic involvement.

Such a top-down implementation turns the whole concept of technologically-assisted democracy on its head. (I'm sure I sound like a broken record by now.)

Now, in my eyes, the PIJ done at MPR (Leonard Witt, wasn't it?) is not really so much a part of that corporate-driven knowledge management program that is going on in the industry right now. Why? Because of the P in MPR: Public. Sure, it's a corporation, but it's a public corporation, running on public support. If Public Interest Journalism is working in Minnesota, it's because it is supported by the public. MPR is not going to profit from reader/listener contributions.

Gannett, on the other hand, who I have written about recently, is trying to solicit similar contributions from their readers and they hope to profit from those contributions.

What's missing is the community stake.

Online communities and organizations such as ours because we work together for collective gain. That does not exist and will not exist at small-market (or large-market) news outlets that have anonymous, distant, corporate owners.

I would think if they truly want to succeed they will not simply try to mimic the successful online communities, but they will find a way to return ownership to localities. Perhaps they could offer local advertisers a share of ownership instead of merely trying to sell them space. Readers need to know that the community has the larger stake in the medium, in the message that they are being asked to build - and not some guys with golden parachutes on Wall Street USA.

Aspiring and working journalists who are truly dedicated to journalism will eventually break away from the corporations, not motivated by competition but by a sense of community. It won't be easy for them (see Muncie Free Press, currently my favorite example), but little by little, one by one, journalism will be taken back by the people, for the people, just as we are seeing in politics and government.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
by wanderindiana on Mon Jan 22, 2007 at 09:44:28 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Support ePluribus Media -- Support Citizen Powered Journalism!

ePluribus Media

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

members


community front page

make a new account


Username:
Password:

create account | faq | search | community front page |