Subscribe to ePluribus Media



ePluribus Media Store


Want Headlines via Email?
Enter your email address:


Help Save 1.800.SUICIDE


LAMONT took my TOWN by a 2 to 1 margin! Primary Day - Lieberman Lamont

by rcs1

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us
Looks like it's official

[editor's note, by wanderindiana] Bumped and promoted. I'll be attempting to provide updates from across the CT blogosphere throughout the day on this race; hopefully, we'll get one or two more updates from Cho as well. -wander

Update [2006-8-8 15:37:34 by Cho]:According to a diaryist on Kos, Lamont's campaign, as a courtesy to Lieberman, offered its technical people to host a cached version of Lieberman's site..diary here. Lamont Campaign Posts Joe 2006 Site -Lieberman campaign refused the offer

Update [2006-8-8 20:26:59 by Cho]: More below, but as of 6:50 in our little town, we are looking at 46.6 percent turnout. That sounds bad, but it's good for a primary. Lieberman's been saying that high turnout is good for him...but high turn out is good for all of us in a democracy... (just my little editorializing there)

Other updates at bottom, below the fold


Primary Eve

Got some emails from SueinKY who's been rooting for Lamont from down, well, Kentucky way. So I promised to keep SueinKY updated on our tiny corner of the state. Several other ePMedia folk have been doing lots to help too and keeping fingers crossed too.  

Not sure how much anyone is interested, but thought I would include notes from our town and add to them as the day goes along.

Sorry that these are notes from just one little Connecticut town in the eastern part of the state, and don't reflect the state as a whole, especially the cities.


commentary :: :: :: buzz-it!
Yesterday evening about 5:30, I got a robo call from the Lieberman campaign... Joe himself was telling me that he isn't Bush, that he challenges Bush, he disagrees with Bush, that he doesn't even look like Bush, and really, truly, he isn't Bush -- got that?

I thought the robo-call pretty shrill and mused that perhaps it was Lieberman shooting himself in his remaining foot. But my opinions have been woefully wrong on these calls. For example, I thought the Clinton robo call for Lieberman -- a tape of his Waterbury speech ending-rouser "he's a good Democrat and he'll do you proud!" was going to really change votes...but apparently while people still love Clinton and the cheering Waterbury crowds on the tape, it has not been as effective as hoped.

The last Lamont push started with another phone call, a live call, last night about 8:30. It was the Lamont campaign manager asking if we could come get our Poll packets... My car is in the shop, and the Better Half was at a town meeting, so I called another member of the town committee to make the 30 minute drive down to CT-CD2 headquarters.

After a flurry of activity, Better Half actually got home in time so we took off and got to the CD-2 headquarters around 9:30-10:00 pm. Bunch of phone bankers were sitting around talking and wrapping up-- now too late to call folks.

Katie (the CD-2 Campaign Manager) and another volunteer were entering data into the computers and other volunteers, including "Dad," the designer and creator of the infamous Kiss float, were making up packages for the poll watchers. Better Half and "Dad" shared notes, while I doublechecked that we had enough palm cards, posters, more buttons, etc. for today.

As an aside: Our biggest brush with "blogger" fame was being in the presence of "Dad" when he designed the Kiss Float on a paper napkin at the planning meeting for Willimantic's boom box parade. (There were all of 7 there -- Dad and son and a young woman sketching the kiss float idea; two women from CT NOW who had the statue of liberty float with the symbol for female in her hand instead of the torch... and a Lamont guy from Vernon, another town in the CD-2, Katie the Manager for the CD-2, and us.

(We didn't contribute anything but our encouragement at the meeting, but it was a reminder of what huge things can be done by a very few committed people.)

Back to last night: The 5 or 6 phone banking young folks/volunteers were lighthearted. We older folks (Dad, Better Half, Katie, another volunteer and the guys packing boxes) seemed to be the worriers.

CT-CD 2 is all of Connecticut east of the Connecticut River -- it's big geographically, but we are a bunch of small towns, not really part of the political machinery.....although, frankly, that made us dangerous during the convention, because we are not beholden to anyone ... many of us don't give a damn, actually, and can speak our hearts. (For example, 3 of the 6 towns that have passed resolutions about Joe running as an independent are in the CD-2 ... those three towns are Willington, Hampton, and now Cantebury, just this week (New Britain, Greenwich and Norwalk are the other three -- for perspective, that is 6 out of 192 or something like that towns).

Ain't all this useless information fascinating?

Morning Update:

We had thunderstorms late last night, but Better Half has already done the morning shift (6:00 to 8:00) at our polling place. Seasoned workers in town say that turnout was light. Hoping that is the case only for our area.

I am off now, driving a Lieberman voter, sigh, to the polls.

10:42 AM update

from phone call with the guys doing the sign waving at the polls

Slow but steady stream. CT hasn't had a meaningful Democratic primary for several years, so getting folks out on an early August day is hard. But it's a gorgeous day here in eastern CT. Cool, sunny... we'll see if it heats up.

They suspect turn out is a little bit up from "normal." Lots of older folks with Lamont signs and stickers on their cars, which we take as a good omen, as that was one of the groups that the Lieberman campaign seemed to still be resonating with.

Expecting a slight increase around noon/lunchtime here and then the largest numbers this evening for the after work traffic.

12:30 Updates

Just back from the town offices ... slow, but steady stream continues. One woman came in wearing her portable oxygen. Lots of older folks voting. Don't know what that means. Unofficial tally at this time is about 20% voter turnout as of noon... making the state projections of 40% sound reasonable.

Lots of thumbs up signs, but hard to tell for sure and the day is about to get hotter. As driver being able to park within 75 feet for my elderly passenger, I made sure that the Lamont sticker was off the car, but slapped it back on quickly as soon as I could.

Forgot to add: 1 to 3 lamont poll watchers...3 to 4 Hurlburt watchers (state legislature primary); 1-2 Eastwood watchers (same race); 1 Malloy person; NO Lieberman; NO DeStefano...

2:30 Update

I took sandwiches and water to the folks poll standing and "spelled" the Better Half.

The slow, steady stream continued...word was that some of the other towns near us are a lot busier.

One gal had to go to another town to vote, but I gave her Lamont bumper sticker, label pin and sticker... She was quite happy with that. Thumbs up were intermixed with the "look straight aheads" -- so I am not sure what the numbers are, but the seasoned types said that it's usually pretty dead from noon to 4:00 -- it was not dead.

We did get shooed away (very nicely and very kindly) from the steps (the only place in the shade) because we forgot that we had our Lamont stickers on (over our hearts - of course!). Decided shade was at that moment more important that a disposable replaceable Lamont sticker, so we took them off and continued drinking our water and eating our sandwiches.

As soon as we got outside the 75 foot limit, we donned new stickies.

Home for some RandR and then back out to wave at the homeward bound traffic.

4:30 -- will be going off with another town committee member (also one of the 505 CT Dem Delegates who voted for Lamont in the infamous CT-Dem Convention) to do the waving at the Highway exit. Will be back, hopefully, to give another update before polls close.

6:50 Update

We have an hour to go before the polls close. Turnout is currently at 46.5 percent... means it will go higher. Very good for this little town. We stood at the exit ramp from about 4:30 to 6:30 -- (we have three exit ramps for our town, we chose the one on the way to the polling spot) and waved. We got tons of waves and honks and high fives (but a few of those finger gestures too) when we did the highway wave thing (Not sure if that's a New England thing or not... basically, standing at the exit ramp with the campaign signs and waving at every car that comes off (cause they probably live in town). The hope is that it is a subtle last minute reminder to vote.

Did have one woman hold up her new generic VOTE JOE sign as she careened down the highway, but generally positive energy. Bad sunburns all around though.

Haven't had time to check any of the other blogs or sites and I am only here for a quick refill to pick up cokes and drinks for the troops.

Next update will probably be with the poll results from our little town, but not sure when that will be.

Forgot to add -- even got waves from the state troopers.

Robo-call notes: I had lain down for a twenty-minute nap and got today's Joe robocall. It starts with HIM explaining to ME how critical this election is. Thanks, Joe... I really needed that. Keep your fingers crossed... I have no clue how it is going.

8:20 Update

Polls closed --53% voter turnout. Lamont -- (299 to 165) two to one over Lieberman! Hoping it is the same as that all over the state.

Display:
I wondered how "the kiss" float began....!!!!
And to be sure, will be glad when the day is done, polls are closed and results are in.  

Looking at CT thru the window from TX....well, we've got our hands full here........good luck!  

by avahome on Tue Aug 08, 2006 at 09:08:09 AM EST

Ain't all this useless information fascinating?

Well, I call it "news".  But WTF do I know . . . Usual rules apply.  Whoever gets the most people to put the "X" by their name wins.  

Just so ya know:  Lieberman got twice the time as Lamont on PBS NewsHour because of the polls.  So in a weird and twisted way, his slippage has gotten him more free publicity than he otherwise could afford.

Must be America.

by rba on Tue Aug 08, 2006 at 09:27:36 AM EST

Hope to see more of this come the general election (wink, wink)!

;-)

I'm so focused on this election I was dreaming about it last night... good results from la-la land, hope they translate to CT today - thanks, Cho!
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
by wanderindiana on Tue Aug 08, 2006 at 09:44:52 AM EST



by Cho on Tue Aug 08, 2006 at 09:49:21 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Thanks for sharing, Cho.

Your comment about the Lieberman robocall had me cleaning lunch off my monitor, though.

"Actually, I am not Bush..."

Beeeeeutiful.

by highacidity on Tue Aug 08, 2006 at 06:05:03 PM EST
[ Parent ]

We just realized this morning that Joe has never been in a primary for his Senate seat...ever.  

I think final voter turnout was in the vicinity of 270,000 - 280,000 range -- you know, just the rabid leftists.

I actually like the quote, the "revenge of moderates" that I saw over on Kos.

by Cho on Wed Aug 09, 2006 at 11:34:08 AM EST
[ Parent ]

There were just over 283,000 votes cast.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
by wanderindiana on Wed Aug 09, 2006 at 12:36:04 PM EST
[ Parent ]
..from the cities and other parts of the state, can you post 'em here?

I will stop in from time to time to give updates, but I don't have time to check the papers or blogs.

Oh, our town uses those old clunky wonderful voting machines that make that resounding sound when one pulls the lever to record the vote.  

Soon, unfortunately, to be replaced by optical scanners.

by Cho on Tue Aug 08, 2006 at 09:48:52 AM EST

I'll try to do roundups every couple of hours from the blogosphere, with links... turn this into an open thread, perhaps, and keep bumping it...
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
by wanderindiana on Tue Aug 08, 2006 at 09:58:20 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I'm wondering about voter turnout.

Sheesh - for such a little state, CT is ending up being a heavyweight.  Never paid so much attention to it!

by kfred on Tue Aug 08, 2006 at 10:06:46 AM EST
[ Parent ]

 

Connecticut Blogs

At least, here's a handful of resources hastily chosen from personal experience:

  • ConnecticutBLOG
  • My Left Nutmeg
  • spazeboy
  • Lamont Blog
  • Connecticut Bob
  • CT Blue

    and, for all of those many others, this aggregator

  • CT Weblogs
    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
    by wanderindiana on Tue Aug 08, 2006 at 10:09:09 AM EST
  • There are three very good personal anecdotes on the front page of My Left Nutmeg right now:

    The First Vote for Ned Lamont...
    by: Maura
    Tue Aug 08, 2006 at 10:39:23 AM EDT
    ...in my precinct this morning, Stamford High School, was mine!  It was quite satisfying to be casting a vote at my alma mater, which also happens to be Joe's alma mater.

    Notes From A Poll Watcher
    by: BranfordBoy
    Tue Aug 08, 2006 at 10:40:31 AM EDT
    Just back from four-plus hours of poll watching duty in Branford's fourth district and I am much more hopeful than I was after grumping through the third and (thank God!) final Blogger central gathering last night.
    Overall, turnout seemed light, which conventional wisdom says is good for Lamont. I was surprised that they have alloted less space and fewer voting booths than I'm used to here.

    Poll watcher turnout was also light. I was the sole Lamont representative there until I was relived just after ten and I was surprised (quite pleasantly) that there was zero Lieberman presence. I had expected paid LieberYouth to be hurling imprecations at me. Perhaps those rumors of Joe scaling back his GOTV efforts were true.


    Poll-Standing this morning: "Say Bye-bye Joe"
    by: jacqui
    Tue Aug 08, 2006 at 09:41:27 AM EDT
    ( - promoted by BranfordBoy)

    First report from the ground: just got back from pollstanding in Newtown this morning.  A very receptive and nice crowd, though quite low-key.  The highlight, though, was when we went to vote...

    And Joe's campaign site is still offline - account suspended.
    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
    by wanderindiana on Tue Aug 08, 2006 at 12:45:39 PM EST
    [ Parent ]

    Doing informal exit polling, results from Meriden expected up shortly; results from Milford available here.
    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
    by wanderindiana on Tue Aug 08, 2006 at 01:11:12 PM EST
    [ Parent ]
    You send it right down tubes and into the box, its great to have the "I was there and what I did story". Looking forward to more, and I've got my toes crossed now too, not bad for someone with arthritis!

    by Chris White on Tue Aug 08, 2006 at 12:13:42 PM EST
    Connecticut Local Politics has an on-the-record denial from Tim Tagaris over at Lamont HQ of involvement in the Lieberman website/email disruption of the past 24 hours.

    More good stuff there, hat tip to the CT Bob site!
    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
    by wanderindiana on Tue Aug 08, 2006 at 01:22:58 PM EST

    The twits - no fact-checking, investigation or anything - just innuendoes of it being Lamont's folks who took down the site.

    It's so stupid!  Kos has the screen cap reflecting a billing problem on the front page even as we speak.

    by kfred on Tue Aug 08, 2006 at 02:13:50 PM EST
    [ Parent ]

    out there today so that it can affect votes...


    by Cho on Tue Aug 08, 2006 at 02:40:06 PM EST
    [ Parent ]
    Here we go site designer and trace goes to The Planet.com in Texas

    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14245779/

    The attack began Monday morning, the campaign office said, and the site went down for good Monday evening.

    Suggestions that the site had gone out of service because the campaign had failed to pay its bill were incorrect, Steinfels said.

    The site was designed by Geary Interactive, based in Las Vegas, Steinfels said. Efforts to reach company president Dan Geary weren't immediately successful.

    Electronic traces of the site point to a Texas-based company named ThePlanet.com.  Operators there refused phone calls from reporters.


     (my emphasis added)

    by avahome on Tue Aug 08, 2006 at 03:49:57 PM EST
    [ Parent ]
    Hope BranfordBoy doesn't mind the straight lift:
    It's the best, and really funny! Senator Lieberman, J'Accuse!

    STATEMENT FROM MY LEFT NUTMEG.COM
    For the past twenty-four hours my toaster oven has been acting funny. I turn the little darkness thingy all the way up and the toast still comes out only half toasted. I believe this is a retaliation by my political opponents for my blogging about their dirty tricks.

    Since becoming a left-wing wacko I have lived my commitment to being lax on security by occasionally leaving my front door unlocked. It would be child's play for my political opponents to sneak in, diddle with my toaster oven, and slink back out into the night their nefarious diddling accomplished. Of course, it's totally unreasonable to expect me to be able to fix it myself.

    I call on Senator Lieberman to make an unequivocal statement denouncing this kind of dirty campaign trick and to demand whoever is responsible to cease and desist immediately. Any attempt to suppress voter participation (how can you vote when you're worried sick about your toaster oven?) and undermine the voting process on Election Day by depriving me of decent toast on which to slather my peanut butter is deplorable and has no place in our democracy.

    [signed] BranfordBoy



    by Cho on Tue Aug 08, 2006 at 03:12:54 PM EST
    I actually packed up my toaster oven and only use a REAL toaster now for that exact same reason.

    Though it could have been because the knob kept falling off.

    I'm hoping that some MSM types learn something about the internet "tubes" as a result of this.  They might actually ask some pointed questions.

    by kfred on Tue Aug 08, 2006 at 04:14:29 PM EST
    [ Parent ]

    to NPR's Albany station WAMC.

    again, unofficial results and 38% of precincts reporting it's

    Lamont 54% to Lieberman 46%.

    I'll say that I've NEVER EVER heard blogs and bloggers used so much, the root word must be some 10% of the word volume coming through and the Daily Kos references are a large portion of the named-space under discussion.


    by luaptifer on Tue Aug 08, 2006 at 09:25:30 PM EST

    Connecticut Local Politics reports a Lamont lead from varying sources, varying percentage of precincts counted... and reports (verified here) that the Secretary of State's election site is crashed due to out-of-state hits! [Totally true... error message to follow]

    Error

    An unexpected error has occurred on this page.The system administrators have been notified.

    The error occurred in:
    http://www.statementofvote-sots.ct.gov/StatementOfVote/WebModules/ReportsLink/USSenTownView.aspx?Par ameter=08/08/2006-Primary

    Error Message:
    A Crystal Reports job failed because a free license could not be obtained in the time allocated. More licenses can be purchased direct from Crystal Decisions or through the Crystal Decisions Online Store.

    Error Stack:
    CrystalDecisions.CrystalReports.Engine.OutOfLicenseException: A Crystal Reports job failed because a free license could not be obtained in the time allocated. More licenses can be purchased direct from Crystal Decisions or through the Crystal Decisions Online Store.
       at .I(String , EngineExceptionErrorID )
       at CheckLicenseStatus()
       at CrystalDecisions.CrystalReports.Engine.ReportDocument.Load(String reportName, OpenReportMethod openMethod, Int16 parentJob)
       at CrystalDecisions.CrystalReports.Engine.ReportClass.Load(String reportName, OpenReportMethod openMethod, Int16 parentJob)
       at CrystalDecisions.CrystalReports.Engine.ReportDocument.(()
       at CrystalDecisions.CrystalReports.Engine.ReportDocument.5()
       at CrystalDecisions.CrystalReports.Engine.ReportDocument.get_PrintOptions()
       at Sots.WebModules.MaintManager.Web.USSenTownView.InitializeComponent()
       at Sots.WebModules.MaintManager.Web.USSenTownView.OnInit(EventArgs e)
       at System.Web.UI.Control.InitRecursive(Control namingContainer)
       at System.Web.UI.Page.ProcessRequestMain()


    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
    by wanderindiana on Tue Aug 08, 2006 at 10:00:24 PM EST
    [ Parent ]
    10PM EDT:

    Precincts Reporting: 73.66%

              # votes    %
    Lieberman  96,235   48.27
    Lamont     103,145   51.73


    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
    by wanderindiana on Tue Aug 08, 2006 at 10:05:37 PM EST
    These guys are at Lamont HQ...
    With 542/743 precincts

    Lamont 117,678
    Lieberman 110,339

    We are way ahead of WTIC's live stream on the results.

    That was as of 9:54 EDT, about 30 minutes ago, and that's 72.9% of precincts, numbers are close to unofficial AP reports via the Hartford Courant:

    U.S. Senate - - Dem Primary
    618 of 748 Precincts Reporting - 82.62%
    Name    Party    Votes    Pct
    Lamont, Ned    Dem    119,100    51.83
    Lieberman, Joe (i)    Dem    110,686    48.17

    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
    by wanderindiana on Tue Aug 08, 2006 at 10:22:27 PM EST
    [ Parent ]
    U.S. Senate - - Dem Primary
    627 of 748 Precincts Reporting - 83.82%
    Name    Party    Votes    Pct
    Lamont, Ned    Dem    120,890    51.90
    Lieberman, Joe (i)    Dem    112,060    48.10

    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
    by wanderindiana on Tue Aug 08, 2006 at 10:35:13 PM EST
    [ Parent ]
    U.S. Senate - - Dem Primary
    648 of 748 Precincts Reporting - 86.63%
    Name    Party    Votes    Pct
    Lamont, Ned    Dem    124,528    51.82
    Lieberman, Joe (i)    Dem    115,803    48.18

    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
    by wanderindiana on Tue Aug 08, 2006 at 10:38:11 PM EST
    [ Parent ]
    U.S. Senate - - Dem Primary
    651 of 748 Precincts Reporting - 87.03%
    Name    Party    Votes    Pct
    Lamont, Ned    Dem    124,940    51.84
    Lieberman, Joe (i)    Dem    116,060    48.16

    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
    by wanderindiana on Tue Aug 08, 2006 at 10:42:52 PM EST
    [ Parent ]
    U.S. Senate - - Dem Primary
    667 of 748 Precincts Reporting - 89.17%
    Name    Party    Votes    Pct
    Lamont, Ned    Dem    127,786    51.60
    Lieberman, Joe (i)    Dem    119,867    48.40

    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
    by wanderindiana on Tue Aug 08, 2006 at 10:47:02 PM EST
    [ Parent ]
    U.S. Senate - - Dem Primary
    702 of 748 Precincts Reporting - 93.85%
    Name    Party    Votes    Pct
    Lamont, Ned    Dem    134,942    51.65
    Lieberman, Joe (i)    Dem    126,330    48.35

    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
    by wanderindiana on Tue Aug 08, 2006 at 10:52:42 PM EST
    [ Parent ]
    U.S. Senate - - Dem Primary
    706 of 748 Precincts Reporting - 94.39%
    Name    Party    Votes    Pct
    Lamont, Ned    Dem    136,353    51.73
    Lieberman, Joe (i)    Dem    127,249    48.27

    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
    by wanderindiana on Tue Aug 08, 2006 at 10:57:10 PM EST
    [ Parent ]
    U.S. Senate - - Dem Primary
    713 of 748 Precincts Reporting - 95.32%
    Name    Party    Votes    Pct
    Lamont, Ned    Dem    138,836    51.92
    Lieberman, Joe (i)    Dem    128,566    48.08

    Lieberman is on live right now, C-SPAN.
    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
    by wanderindiana on Tue Aug 08, 2006 at 11:04:12 PM EST
    [ Parent ]

    U.S. Senate - - Dem Primary
    724 of 748 Precincts Reporting - 96.79%
    Name    Party    Votes    Pct
    Lamont, Ned    Dem    141,623    51.85
    Lieberman, Joe (i)    Dem    131,491    48.15

    That guy wants to get pounded in November, fine. Let's pound him.
    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
    by wanderindiana on Tue Aug 08, 2006 at 11:15:45 PM EST
    [ Parent ]

    U.S. Senate - - Dem Primary
    733 of 748 Precincts Reporting - 97.99%
    Name    Party    Votes    Pct
        Lamont, Ned    Dem    143,363    51.81
    Lieberman, Joe (i)    Dem    133,323    48.19

    Lamont is speaking about getting things done, while Joe cried and whined about how his party done him wrong...
    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
    by wanderindiana on Tue Aug 08, 2006 at 11:22:52 PM EST
    [ Parent ]

    U.S. Senate - - Dem Primary
    736 of 748 Precincts Reporting - 98.40%
    Name    Party    Votes    Pct
        Lamont, Ned    Dem    144,336    51.81
    Lieberman, Joe (i)    Dem    134,257    48.19

    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
    by wanderindiana on Wed Aug 09, 2006 at 12:35:11 AM EST
    [ Parent ]
    U.S. Senate - - Dem Primary
    748 of 748 Precincts Reporting - 100.00%
    Name                     Party            Votes       Pct
    Lamont, Ned            Dem            146,587    51.79
    Lieberman, Joe (i)    Dem            136,468    48.21

    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
    by wanderindiana on Wed Aug 09, 2006 at 11:27:21 AM EST
    [ Parent ]
    is running the results using local CT television.  Statewide as of now Lamont leads by about 7000 votes.

    by rba on Tue Aug 08, 2006 at 10:21:29 PM EST
    (and biting fingernails :o)


    On PTSD Combat | Email list | Book
    by ilona on Tue Aug 08, 2006 at 10:37:31 PM EST

    Was reading on dKos about previous record primary turnout being around 170K voters... at 86% right now, there have been 240K votes counted... that's on track for about 280K total turnout for this primary!

    Truly it is a victory for democracy, above all...
    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
    by wanderindiana on Tue Aug 08, 2006 at 10:40:57 PM EST
    [ Parent ]

    ...for turnout. That truly is a triumph! Fingers and toes crossed, turning blue, and hoping that this is a going to be a shot of energy for our movement as we move towards November...

    You've been doing a great job with the updates. Thanks!
    On PTSD Combat | Email list | Book
    by ilona on Tue Aug 08, 2006 at 10:43:57 PM EST
    [ Parent ]

    C'mon Little Connecticut, you can do it!

    I think I can,
    I think I can,
    I think I can.

    Keep going, Little Connecticut! We're rooting for you on the sidelines, all the way...

    I think I can,
    I think I can,
    I think I can.

    Bring it on home, Little Connecticut!!!
    On PTSD Combat | Email list | Book
    by ilona on Tue Aug 08, 2006 at 10:53:33 PM EST

    I just sent off my note to Harry!  This is a terrific suggestion!

    "We're gonna bring the fight to Joe.  In the mean time, here's what YOU can do.  Go here
    http://reid.senate.gov/contact/
    and write to Harry Reid.   Now that Joe isn't a Democrat, he needs to be stripped of all his committee memberships.  And remember that the Democratic party has to get behind the winner of the Democratic primary."


    by avahome on Wed Aug 09, 2006 at 12:10:01 AM EST
    Thank you for letting me share all this with you...

    We are totally sunburned, exhausted, and happy.

    wander, thank you for all the great numbers and updates, and all of you, thank you for the support for Ned.  

    Woo Hoo!  

    (gosh, what time is it that I have to go to work tomorrow?)

    by Cho on Tue Aug 08, 2006 at 11:48:01 PM EST

    Support ePluribus Media -- Support Citizen Powered Journalism!

    ePluribus Media

    ↑ Grab this Headline Animator

    members


    community front page

    make a new account


    Username:
    Password:

    create account | faq | search | community front page |