![]() |
||
|
|
by
Fri Jun 23, 2006 at 05:41:01 PM EST
(Promoted and originally posted at Fri Jun 23, 2006 at 06:30:22 AM EST -- 'nets)
(I also took five mins and plotted your data --'nets)
![]() Something everyone should keep an eye on if troop numbers start decreasing: the number of contractors in Iraq. While it may look pretty to everyone at home to see troop numbers go down, if the number of contractors is simultaneously going up, it's a draw and nothing more than political maneuvering to make the war appear more palatable to the American public. Let's look at some numbers.
commentary :: :: :: buzz-it!
For the purposes of this review, I am relying on data from the Brookings Institute, The Iraq Index (PDF), May 30, 2006.
page 20 - Troops US & Coalition
May 2003 150,000 US troopsMay 2004 138,000 US troopsMay 2005 138,000 US troopsIn June 2005, PBS estimated 110,000-140,000 contractors in Iraq with an additional 15,000 Iraqis under contract to guard the oil infrastructure. Of the contractors, 50,000 were employed by KBR who administers the LOGCAPIII contract for the US Army. http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/warriors/faqs/
June 2006 132,000 US troops (down 6,000 since Jan)Other than a brief reduction in May 2004, the numbers aren't going down, they're going up! And Iraq isn't paying the contractors, the US taxpayer is. So if the White House starts talking about reductions in troop numbers, everyone needs to keep an eye on the number of contractors going into Iraq in their place. The above should also make it very clear why the Iraq supplementals and the Defense Budget haven't seen any significant reduction in costs.
Note:
Making the War in Iraq Palatable at Home | 24 comments (24 topical, 0 hidden)
Making the War in Iraq Palatable at Home | 24 comments (24 topical, 0 hidden)
|
Support ePluribus Media -- Support Citizen Powered Journalism! recent commentaries
front page
Tuesday November 27th
Monday November 26th
|