Subscribe to ePluribus Media



ePluribus Media Store


Want Headlines via Email?
Enter your email address:


Help Save 1.800.SUICIDE


Part D: Chronically Ill

by rcs1

[editor's note, by Cho] Part III -- important stuff

Newsday:

Dr. Jerry Avorn wrote in the April 18 New England Journal of Medicine,

"Despite its youth, the Medicare drug benefit is already chronically ill. ... Debate continues over whether its early spasticity was caused by inept management of its birth or a genetic disorder present at its creation."

The AARP, still believes Part D is undergoing growing pains, found that for the sixth straight year, the prices for 193 brand-name prescription drugs rose, by 6 percent in 2005, and over the six years they soared by 40 percent.  This is higher than the rate of inflation.

AARP's director of policy and strategy,John Rother

"Drug affordability continues to be a major challenge, and AARP is fighting high drug costs on many fronts."

Despite his statement, no specifics are mentioned.

continued


commentary :: :: :: buzz-it!
Rother does not mention that AARP supported the benefit, and was instrumental in the passage of Part D.  Neither does he mention that the AARP has a partnership in the sale of the UnitedHealth policies and receives millions in royaties as a result.

There are 1,400 plans from 50 insurance companies, working closely with drug companies, and making substantial profits from Part D.

The New York Times reported in March, "If things play out the way some big insurers hope, the drug program could prove to be a feeder system into much greater private presence in Medicare - a long-standing goal of the Bush administration."

In  his radio address, George W. Bush claimed

`` Medicare prescription drug coverage is a great deal for seniors.  Even if you do not have significant drug expenses now, you should consider joining a Medicare drug plan to protect yourself against high prescription drug bills down the road.''

There have been complaints about the complexity of the plans, delays in benefits taking effect and in reimbursements.

According to Saul Friedman of Newsday,

"Part D is not a Medicare benefit, and cutting Medicare out of the picture is what keeps drug and coverage prices high."
 

CMS have announced the Part D deductible and out-of-pocket expenses, including the doughnut hole is going to increase by nearly 7 percent next year.

The Part D annual deductible will increase from $250 to $265. Co-payments for the poor will also increse.

The coverage amount will also increase from $2,250 to $2,400.

The modest good news is that the initial drug coverage will go up from $2,250 to $2,400. But this year's doughnut hole of $2,850, during which you pay 100 percent of your drugs' costs will grow to $3,051.25.


Once in the doughnut hole next year, getting out will cost your account a total of $5,451.25 ($2,400 plus $3,051.25), up from the current $5,100 ($2,250 plus $2,850). Once out of the hole, you'll continue to qualify for catastrophic coverage, when Part D pays 95 percent of drug costs.

Still looking ahead, monthly Medicare Part B premiums for next year are expected to rise from the current $88.50 to $100.40, a 13.4 percent increase. But the same law that gave us Part D also introduced means testing for the first time in Medicare's history. Starting Jan. 1, part B premiums are expected to rise to new highs on a sliding scale for about 2.4 million persons who earn more than $80,000 a year. Their monthly premium could be as high as $173.30 in 2007.

Part D also introduced means testing for the first time in Medicare's history. Starting Jan. 1, part B premiums are expected to rise to new highs on a sliding scale for about 2.4 million persons who earn more than $80,000 a year. Their monthly premium could be as high as $173.30 in 2007.

Some believe that the affluent should pay more. However, means testing changed the universal nature of Medicare as beneficiaries' financial records will be scrutinized. Medicare could become a program for the sick, old and poor, if the affluent decide to leave, rather than have their privacy invaded.

Many are hoping that, as seniors reach the donut hole amount, their anger will translate into votes for candidates who are in support of Part D and   other healthcare reform.  Both the Medicare Rights Center and the Center for Medicare Advocacy are leading the fight for real reform.  

Which side will the AARP take?

Display:
At the Orange Place and others as well.

by Terri Emerick on Sat May 06, 2006 at 10:55:54 PM EST
Terri, you're in-depth on this topic, could you explain the donut hole a bit.

Is that the gap between what is covered initially and when total coverage kicks in or something?

by kfred on Sun May 07, 2006 at 09:43:45 AM EST
[ Parent ]

The donut hole is a gap in coverage under Part D. This year, the Part D plan one is enrolled in picks up the coverage until $2,250 is spent on prescriptions.  
This amount is reached by taking into consideration the full cost of the drugs, not just the beneficiary's out-of-pocket cost-sharing. For example, if a drug costs $150 and the beneficiary's co-payment is $40, the full $150 counts towards the initial coverage.

After the initial coverage limit is reached, one must pay $3600 in out-of-pocket expenses, which including deductibles, co-payments or co-insurances.  Then, after spending that amount, the person will be eligible for catastrophic coverage, which can include prescriptions.

Depending on the type of prescriptions that one takes, a person can hit the donut hole/coverage gap at any time.  Some who take expensive prescriptions, ex. certain cancer drugs, have already hit it.  Others will be hitting it shortly.  It varies.

However, it must be noted that the donut hole/coverage gap will and, in some instances, is already having an effect on some, as they are faced w/situation of being unable to afford prescriptions.

And, even when a person is in the donut hole, they must continue to pay premiums for a their policy although they are not receiving any prescription coverage during that time.

by Terri Emerick on Sun May 07, 2006 at 12:05:20 PM EST
[ Parent ]

I can't believe the initial coverage limit is $2,250 before a person has to fork over $3,600 of their own savings. Am I reading that right (I admit I don't have enough time to follow this story like I'd like to)? The way prescription drugs are priced these days, $2,250 is absolutely nothing. What an absolute rip-off for our seniors.

Thanks for covering this topic for us. Really hope to see more of these commentaries in the future; you've saved me a lot of reading on the issue just in this diary alone!
On PTSD Combat | Email list | Book
by ilona on Sun May 07, 2006 at 02:23:29 PM EST
[ Parent ]

And, with the recent increases in pharmaceutical costs, some are hitting the donut hole already.

by Terri Emerick on Sun May 07, 2006 at 02:32:52 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Please keep us updated!
On PTSD Combat | Email list | Book
by ilona on Sun May 07, 2006 at 05:15:34 PM EST
[ Parent ]
This is effecting too many good people.

by Terri Emerick on Mon May 15, 2006 at 09:51:38 PM EST
[ Parent ]
enough to have CNN on yesterday when they played a portion of Bush's radio address.  I'd like to see the survey he was touting:

'Recent surveys show that the vast majority of seniors are satisfied with the program,' Bush said today, adding that it gives the elderly 'more and better choices' because they can choose the plan that 'best fits their needs.'


by standingup on Sun May 07, 2006 at 11:52:05 AM EST
The Hill

A Washington Post-ABC News survey last month showed 65 percent of people are satisfied with their drug plans. An AARP poll concluded that 78 percent are satisfied. Industry-sponsored surveys made similar findings.


by Terri Emerick on Sun May 07, 2006 at 12:16:10 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I guess Bush's statement wasn't wrong yet it surprised me.  Would be interesting to see the exact polling information.  

by standingup on Sun May 07, 2006 at 01:17:25 PM EST
[ Parent ]
It is my understanding that the survey that is being cited by Bush was done by AHIP, a trade organization that represents insurance companies. In addition, the survey consisted of contacting 800 people.

A majority of senior citizens in a recent poll say they had no trouble using -- or signing up for -- the controversial 10-week-old Medicare prescription drug plan, health insurance officials said today.

"The data are very encouraging," Karen Ignagni, chief executive of America's Health Insurance Plans (AHIP), the trade group that commissioned the survey, said at an afternoon briefing in Washington. " . . . What seniors are saying is this program is working for them. It's making a difference."

Robert Hayes, of the Medicare Right Center, disagrees, as do other advocates.

"The HMO industry and its Washington lobbyists may be the least trusted sources of honest data in the country," Robert M. Hayes, president of the Medicare Rights Center, said in an e-mail to The Washington Post. "The HMO industry will spend millions to protect this cash cow that the Bush Administration and Congressional leadership gave it."

So, a question needs to be answered:  Is it possible that the data was skewed?

by Terri Emerick on Sun May 07, 2006 at 01:56:25 PM EST
[ Parent ]

...great question, there.
On PTSD Combat | Email list | Book
by ilona on Sun May 07, 2006 at 02:24:51 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Seattle Times
Part D might not be working so well for a substantial minority of patients: seniors with complex illnesses and those requiring relatively expensive medicines.

These patients often face high costs under the new program that threaten to put needed treatment beyond their reach. A recent poll for the Kaiser Family Foundation found that 19 percent of enrolled seniors said they expect their medications to cost them more under Part D, compared with the 55 percent who said they would save.

That's because the private insurance companies quietly put these medicines into special coverage tiers that carry higher costs for patients. Doing this helps the companies meet the twin goals of saving taxpayers money while earning a profit.

Going to see if I can find that survey you mentioned now.

by Terri Emerick on Sun May 07, 2006 at 12:09:33 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Support ePluribus Media -- Support Citizen Powered Journalism!

ePluribus Media

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

members


community front page

make a new account


Username:
Password:

create account | faq | search | community front page |