Subscribe to ePluribus Media



ePluribus Media Store


Want Headlines via Email?
Enter your email address:


Help Save 1.800.SUICIDE


Shooting Holes In Cheney's Story II

by rcs1

The mass of contradictions and unlikely explanations that have emerged since the news that Vice President Dick Cheney shot a hunting companion was made public last Sunday, becomes even more strange the deeper one delves into the story. Earlier today, I outlined the many differing accounts of the events surrounding the shooting that have been provided by Cheney's main witness, Katharine Armstrong.

Now I'd like to follow up with a look at other conflicting statements and inexplicable behavior by both the Keneday County Sheriff's Office and the Secret Service. Let's start with this excerpt from the press release  issued by the Sheriff's office:

The investigation reveals that there was no alcohol, or misconduct involved in the incident.

Yes, the investigation.  The investigation that began 15 hours after the shooting...I find that much more revealing than the press release.


commentary :: :: :: buzz-it!
Let's begin with the "investigation" by the Sheriff's Office::
In an interview, Kenedy County Sheriff Ramon Salinas III said Charles Kirk, one of his captains, informed him of an "accidental shooting" about 5:30 p.m. Central time Saturday. Kirk told him that he had been summoned to the ranch to escort an ambulance to a hospital in nearby Kingsville.

About 10 minutes later, Salinas said, a Secret Service agent traveling with Cheney called him on his cell phone to say there had been a hunting accident involving the vice president; he did not name the victim.

When Kirk arrived at the ranch, the ambulance had already left...


Actually, this initial report leaves several questions unanswered; Was Salinas saying that Kirk informed him of the shooting at 5:30 or that the shooting took place at 5:30? And who had "summoned" Kirk, and what time did the call come in?  So far the investigation seems to be at a dead end, but then:
Salinas said he called a worker he knew lived on the ranch and asked him for information. The ranch hand, a former county sheriff, called back and described the incident as a hunting accident. Salinas said he decided to send an investigator in the morning because he knew the victim was being hospitalized and he felt assured that it was an accident.

So this was what passed for the initial investigation by the Kenedy County Sheriff's office.  He called a man that he knew, who went and talked to someone he knew.  So of course fourteen hours later, he could say with confidence that his investigation showed no sign of alcohol as a factor in the shooting.  What a relief for everyone involved.

But perhaps realizing that conducting an investigation by phone might be perceived by some as rather lazy and sloppy, Chief Deputy Gilbert San Miguel Jr. rushed to the ranch the next morning to interview Vice President Cheney, where:

Cheney "just explained to me what happened," he said, adding that the vice president characterized the incident as a "hunting accident."

"After what [Cheney] told us, we concluded it was an accident," Salinas said. "All [San Miguel] had left to do was talk to the victim." San Miguel and another sheriff's deputy spoke to Whittington in the hospital Monday morning.

"He did inform me this was an accident," said San Miguel


And of course no one would question the word of the victim, even if:
"Sally (Whittington) May said her father does not recall a lot of the incident, nor was he involved in how or whether information about the incident was released:  `He didn't know at the time if he was going to the hospital or the mortuary.'"

Sheriff Salinas further explained his actions to the Dallas News and gave (another) rather extraordinary example of his unique investigative skills :
"If I wanted to go in there, we would have gone in there," said Mr. Salinas. "If someone called and told me there was a shooting and they didn't think it was an accident, I'd have five or six people on the ranch."

And while we have statements from both the Sheriff's Office and the White House that the sheriff was called  sometime on Saturday evening (more on that later), they apparently weren't admitting it to a lot of people.  For example, from the newspaper that originally broke the story:
Driving back to Corpus Christi, Powell talked to Armstrong in detail, and Garcia reported the story fully. She confirmed the shooting with the White House, checked on Whittington's condition at the hospital and called the Kenedy County Sheriff's Office, who said at the time that they had no record of a shooting incident at the Armstrong Ranch.

And from a rival Corpus Christi newspaper:
Francesco, at the Corpus Christi paper, said she felt it was a bit odd that her newsroom had not received any information about the shooting since "we often call law enforcement in the area, even on weekends. We checked in and didn't hear anything about it."

And when the Dallas Morning News called for a comment:
"There was no immediate reason given as to why the incident wasn't reported until Sunday," the Dallas Morning News observed. "The sheriff's office in Kenedy County did not respond to phone calls Sunday."

One wonders why the Sheriff's office wasn't more forthcoming with information...assuming they had it.

There are also these varying accounts of the police being turned away from the Armstrong ranch after the shooting...we go from this:

The Secret Service said it had turned away one sheriff's deputy at the ranch the night of the accident because arrangements had been made for Cheney to be interviewed the following morning, Associated Press said.

To this:
Secret Service spokesman Eric Zahren said at least one deputy was turned away shortly after the shooting because security personnel at the ranch were not aware of the agreement between the sheriff and the Secret Service.

And finally, to this:
While there were reports, some from the sheriff himself, that a deputy had been dispatched to the ranch on Saturday night and been turned away, Mr. Zahren said that some local police officers had heard about the shooting on a scanner when an ambulance was sent to pick up Mr. Whittington. They showed up at the ranch unsolicited. Private guards, not Secret Service agents, Mr. Zahren said, turned the police away because they did not know anything had occurred.

And for a moment forget how the story changed, and consider this...the police came to the ranch "unsolicited" and were turned away.  From earlier reports, we know that the Sheriff knows there had been a shooting.  Somehow I think that if the police showed up at my door under those circumstances, turning them away would not be an option.

And what time did the shooting take place?  But all accounts, from the White House, from the Sheriff's Office and even as noted on the accident report, the shooting occurred at 5:30 pm.  But today the Secret Service has clarified
their timeline:

Eric Zahren, a Secret Service spokesman, said the shooting occurred at 5:50 p.m. Central time, slightly later than the White House had said at first.

As I said, the official accident report said 5:30, and the Sheriff had announced that a Chief Deputy had gotten a call saying it happened at 5:30...certainly neither of them had gotten their information from the White House, they received their information from the witnesses...Dick Cheney and Katharine Armstrong.  Presumably there is a reason for suddenly changing the time "slightly," but I won't engage in speculation.

 
And finally, I'll end with the question of exactly how far away Whittington was when Vice President Dick Cheney shot him in the face?  At this point, all reports claim that Whittington was "about 30 yards" behind Cheney.  But even Whittington's friends and supporters are having trouble believing that:

Hunters at the Vaughn Building are skeptical. The hunt took place on a cold, windy afternoon. Whittington and his fellow hunters were probably wearing warm clothing--say, a jacket and a flannel shirt. Cheney was using a 28-gauge shotgun, a smaller-diameter firearm with pellets smaller than BBs. Whittington's friends question whether the pellets could have penetrated his layers of clothing and skin at that range. Yet two pellets lodged against his larynx, another was in his liver, and another migrated into the heart muscle, causing the heart attack. The pattern of wounds was between the lower chest and the forehead, a pretty tight zone for shot of 30 yards. If the range was considerably less than 30 yards, then it is likely that Whittington's injuries were worse than the initial statement by Katharine Armstrong indicated. (The blast "knocked him silly," but "he was fine.")

And from the New York Times, a doctor's point of view:
Dr. O. Wayne Isom, the chairman of heart and chest surgery at Weill Cornell Medical College, said it was unlikely that a pellet would migrate to the heart through the bloodstream, as some have assumed from the account of the Texas doctors. [...]

A more likely explanation, Dr. Isom said, is that the pellet lodged in or touched the heart when Mr. Whittington was shot.

This story has moved into the realm of "a riddle inside a mystery, wrapped in an enigma."  And each day of clarification simply raises more questions.  

And I see it's nearly time for Cheney's mea culpa to the world, so perhaps Part III is coming soon.  

Display:
...as was commented upon by the BBC today, the refusal to be open about these events just reinforces the anxiety about the refusal of this administration to be open about every event.

I am glad we got see part two of your DKos diary early over here. Thanks.

by Welshman on Wed Feb 15, 2006 at 02:01:33 PM EST

business associates are cracking jokes about the gang that can't shoot straight.

It's this huge metaphor.

by Cho on Wed Feb 15, 2006 at 03:12:42 PM EST
[ Parent ]

are thorough and well documented.  Thanks for bringing together all of those sources.

I join Welshman in my appreciation for getting the second story here first.  And, I look forward to the recount of Cheney's appearance on Faux News, as I am currently at the workhouse :O

by polydactyl on Wed Feb 15, 2006 at 02:37:23 PM EST

Thanks once again for pulling together a coherent narrative here, Barb!   Pretty hard to do with this bunch spinning tall tales whenever the wind shifts.

And we wonder where Osama been Forgotten is?

by Cho on Wed Feb 15, 2006 at 03:16:26 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Followed you over from dKos.  Don't expect too much from the Hume interview--it'll be taped and edited and then shown @ 6pm!!! All BS!!  

Great sleuthing, BTW, on both diaries!!!

by Phil S 33 on Wed Feb 15, 2006 at 02:37:36 PM EST

Here's something that jumped out at me:

Private guards, not Secret Service agents, Mr. Zahren said, turned the police away because they did not know anything had occurred.

So who are these private guards? Not Secret Service, but apparently they have enough clout to tell the local police to go away. Are they local rent-a-cops? Ranch security? Blackwater commandos?  Who the hell are these guys, and why are they securing a possible crime scene involving the vice president of the United States?

by Pompatus on Wed Feb 15, 2006 at 02:45:08 PM EST

Police officers hear about a shooting on their scanner, go to the property and they allow themselves to be turned away by an alleged rent-a-cop?  Not in my world.  

by BarbinMD on Wed Feb 15, 2006 at 02:49:58 PM EST
[ Parent ]
There are so many odd aspects and conflicting statements in this story. And the situation yesterday where McClellan was joking during the morning gaggle?  The White House had been informed about Whittington's heart attack 3 hours before then. After the screw-up on the initial disclosure, how in the heck did they let this happen again?  That just makes no sense. It's like a collective nervous breakdown.  

by BarbinMD on Wed Feb 15, 2006 at 02:48:03 PM EST
I find this also odd...

`He didn't know at the time if he was going to the hospital or the mortuary.'

Yet news reports persist in minimizing the damage... but the victim himself, according to his daughter, didn't know if he was destined for the hospital of the mortuary??

-- odd choice, that.

by Cho on Wed Feb 15, 2006 at 02:48:21 PM EST

any chance we can get the web team to add either a rule or a 10% shaded box around blockquotes?

by Timroff on Wed Feb 15, 2006 at 02:52:24 PM EST
[ Parent ]
...remember what happened.  And that's the witness that the sheriff relied on to clear up the case.  </eye roll>

And btw, just saw an excerpt of the interview...Cheney said one of the reasons having Armstrong break the story was because, "She was an eye witness.  She saw the whole thing."  Based on emptywheel's observation of her statement that she initially saw the Secret Service running and thought "he" (Cheney?  Whittington?) had experienced a heart-related problem.  And as I pointed out, she was 100 yards away in a closed car.  

by BarbinMD on Wed Feb 15, 2006 at 02:53:26 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Part 2 here.

This is a very interesting way to put together the story.  All the pieces are so strange and the press spins the story different ways everytime anyone digs up new information.  This is very interesting.

by Chip on Wed Feb 15, 2006 at 03:27:21 PM EST

that, last night, revealed that the cops were told to "come back tomorrow" when they showed up to look into this?  As Leno mentioned, that wouldn't happen "in the 'hood", would it?  

The medical team that travels with Cheney immediately began ministering to Whittington, who was bleeding profusely from wounds to his face, neck and chest, witnesses said.

So she's 100 yards away while Whittington was hit from 30 yards distance, apparently enough to allow for the spread of pellets that would span 'face, neck, and chest'.  For a pellet to be threatening heart muscle, that's a good two foot radius...  At 100 yards, she could tell that no indication was made of approach to Cheney by Whittington who was within 30 yards of returning with Cheney's birds from his last sporting blast?

This bird shot is leaving massive holes!


by luaptifer on Wed Feb 15, 2006 at 03:38:17 PM EST

Via Firedoglake:

"Struck on the right side of his face, his neck, and the right torso. Ran over to Whittington who was laying on his back, bleeding, could see where the shot had struck him. Fortunately, had medical team with him -- always have one wherever Cheney goes -- and his physician's assistant was there to administer treatment. Cheney spoke with Whittington, and Harry did not respond."

The guy was unconscious, and medivaced by helicopter.  I think they thought he might die.

This puts the lie to the whole shooting aftermath segment of the story.  

by Mogolori on Wed Feb 15, 2006 at 03:55:29 PM EST

watch for the Bush crowd to start being "upset" with Cheney's handling of the situation, etc. etc. so as to create the scapegoat.

Bush can turn it into a win for himself by making it look as if everything that was wrong with this administration was all Cheney's fault.  Bush, himself, is a mere innocent, just had bad advisors, that's all.

by Cho on Wed Feb 15, 2006 at 04:46:41 PM EST
[ Parent ]


what the hell are we gonna do when

we find out that Bush was the smart one?!?


by luaptifer on Wed Feb 15, 2006 at 06:28:03 PM EST
[ Parent ]


compilation, and I also look forward to part 3.  "Outside" analysis is helping to drive fact-checking editors crazy.  That's a good thing.

by rba on Wed Feb 15, 2006 at 04:14:11 PM EST
Josh Marshall, over at a little blog called TPM, wonders:

How big is the Kenedy County Sheriff's Department? They rapidly concluded that "this was nothing more than a hunting accident."

But how big an outfit is it exactly? Kenedy County has a population of 414 people, which makes it the fourth smallest county in the United States.

The 50,000 acre Armstrong Ranch is in Kenedy County. So I figure the Armstrongs probably have a lot of pull in county government.



by stevelu on Wed Feb 15, 2006 at 04:24:40 PM EST
of course, that Bush's class of the Have Mores are also, obviously, above the law.

by Cho on Wed Feb 15, 2006 at 04:28:53 PM EST
[ Parent ]
That's probably being the employer to half the people in the whole county.

Yup - that's my bread'n'butter you're going to mess with if you don't cooperate with Miz Armstrong et al - much LESS Cheney's wishes!

by kfred on Wed Feb 15, 2006 at 04:42:39 PM EST
[ Parent ]

There were news people speaking with the local deputy...I really didn't notice any insincerety in his voice or actions.  The deputy was inside his car and patiently answered questions.... I was waiting for the usual "well, ma'am here in Texas we do things differently" but didn't hear that.  Was more or less what's the big deal, these things happen around here...hunting accidents.

One reader on firedoglake did bring up the question about the Secret Service protecting Cheney...and why they would let a 78 year old guy with a shotgun in his hand come up behind Cheney? I wonder? Does that sound right to anyone?

by avahome on Wed Feb 15, 2006 at 04:55:10 PM EST

maybe hunting buddies?

We've been wondering here about the women...what's up with that?

by Cho on Wed Feb 15, 2006 at 04:57:48 PM EST
[ Parent ]



by avahome on Wed Feb 15, 2006 at 06:31:56 PM EST
[ Parent ]
 "Hunters at the Vaughn Building are skeptical. The hunt took place on a cold, windy afternoon."  This is direct contradiction to the Game Warden's report that said the day was clear, sunny and calm. Windy is not checked off on the report. I can't locate temp reading for that day.

by DEFuning on Wed Feb 15, 2006 at 05:06:25 PM EST
You can view weather records for the nearby Kingsville Naval Air Station here.

Note how the wind speed dropped sharply during the afternoon, and how the clouds began to disperse. The notion that it was clear and calm at the time of the shooting isn't outside the range of the possible.

by silence on Wed Feb 15, 2006 at 05:16:05 PM EST
[ Parent ]

very thorough!

by Cho on Wed Feb 15, 2006 at 05:39:37 PM EST
[ Parent ]
My Texan husband, who used to manage a very famous ranch next door, says Armstrong has a low population of whites and a high population of minorities who all work for those few whites who own all the land.  Does that remind you of another Southern story? Oh Hillary, how right you were dear.

by DEFuning on Wed Feb 15, 2006 at 05:52:25 PM EST
I don't give a damn about those voters...

by kfred on Wed Feb 15, 2006 at 06:02:14 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I've been sleeping off an all-nighter. I saw and recommended your part one at Daily Kos early this morning and thought that your work on the disparity of Katharine Armstrong's statements was great, but this is even better. This is award-winning stuff you've done here, about some of the best work I've seen in a long time. Just incredible.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
by wanderindiana on Wed Feb 15, 2006 at 08:23:42 PM EST
I got a kick out of Peter Dauo's comments on the noise machine blaming the media for making a big deal out of this incident.  

Standard neo-stuff.  Cheney shoots a buddy in the chest at close range and they blame the press.  

by Jeff Huber on Thu Feb 16, 2006 at 09:23:11 AM EST

Support ePluribus Media -- Support Citizen Powered Journalism!

ePluribus Media

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

members


community front page

make a new account


Username:
Password:

create account | faq | search | community front page |