Subscribe to ePluribus Media



ePluribus Media Store


Want Headlines via Email?
Enter your email address:


Help Save 1.800.SUICIDE


Get the Money out of our Power

by rcs1

[editor's note, by standingup] Promoted

reconstituted from my comment @dkos to dcg2 re:

...Ralph Nader saying there's no difference between Bush and Gore...I can't help but remind them that the greens told a big lie that helped land Bush in the White House

i suspect Nader was simply too specific  

and i HATE that bu$h might have won as a result.

but Nader's right in the broader sense, that it's not just Repubs that whore our representation to the highest-bidders.  

do you think it's simply for fun that 183,000 firms must register as lobbyists?!  and that's pretty much the extent of their restriction beyond filing requirements as to what body they lobbied.

the obscenity of Halliburton getting the Katrina cleanup contract is unspeakable.  but it's only after $hrub stole the first election that HAL was able to cut their lobbying expenditures to a quarter of what they were, pre-2000, since the big Dick was part of the admin.

where do those 183,000 firms apply their effort? jump below to find out...


commentary :: :: :: buzz-it!
i'm with Nader 100% when it comes to getting our leadership out of the pocket of big money:
Center for Public Integrity reveals extent of lobbying influence

Who do lobbyists lobby?


  • U.S. House of Representatives - 17,300 companies

  • U.S. Senate - 17,200 companies

  • Dept. of Defense - 2,800 companies

  • Health & Human Services - 2,400 companies

  • Dept. of Commerce - 2,300 companies

  • Dept. of Treasury - 2,300 companies

  • Dept. of Transportation - 2,200 companies

  • Executive Office of the Pres. - 2,000 companies

  • White House Office - 1,900 companies

  • Dept. of Agriculture - 1,800 companies


What are the top issues lobbied?

  • Federal budget and appropriations - 6,800 companies

  • Health issues - 4,100 companies

  • Defense - 3,700 companies

  • Taxation & Internal Revenue Code - 3,500 companies

  • Transportation - 3,300 companies


Where does the money for lobbying come from?

  • companies (as clients);

  • member dues;

  • tax dollars;

  • and foreign governments.

get the money out of our power!  it's the unfettered access of big money to power that likely explains why semi-privatized FEMA is so fucked up.

Display:
from Josh Marshall @ TPM

...Frankly, if you're looking to nail down some good contracts, I'd definitely try to get into the Shaw Group pipeline, as their site suggests, since they've bought the services of our friend Joe Allbaugh.

Late Update: Everybody gets a taste?  Jim Bernhard, CEO of the Shaw Group is chairman of the Louisiana Democratic Party.



by luaptifer on Wed Sep 07, 2005 at 02:13:08 PM EST

the relatively short time it took to contact their corporate friends and get them involved.  Are they working from no-bid contracts again?  

by standingup on Wed Sep 07, 2005 at 04:02:42 PM EST
[ Parent ]
they must have connections to Allbaugh who was able to beat FEMA to NOLA!

from Josh Marshall again

Back on Monday I told you how the Bush crony catastrophe contracts bonanza would be so big it might even tempt Bush fixer Joe Allbaugh to bring his influence-peddling racket back stateside.

Well, as TPM Reader JV points out, that ship's already sailed.

This article from the September 1st edition of the Post noted that Allbaugh was already in Louisiana "helping coordinate the private-sector response to the storm."

Now, if you figure that an article that appeared on the September 1st was probably reported out on Wednesdy August 31st, perhaps this is one of those cases that show how the public sector just can't match the pace of the private sector, seeing as Allbaugh seems to have beaten most of the folks from FEMA, the agency he ran before handing it off to Michael Brown, into the disaster area.  

I also must confess that I'd been so focused on Allbaugh's Iraq operation, that I had lost track of what he was up to on the domestic rain-making activities.

First, there's Blackwell Fairbanks, the outfit he set up with Andrew Lundquist, the guy who ran Vice President Cheney's energy policy task force.  And then of course there's Allbaugh's main shop, The Allbaugh Company, the one Haley Barbour helped him set up along with New Bridge Strategies, the Iraq venture.

I figure he's in Louisiana wearing the Allbaugh Company hat, seeing as how a few months back he signed on
as a lobbyist for Halliburton subsidiary KBR to "educate the
congressional and executive branch on defense, disaster relief and
homeland security issues."



by luaptifer on Wed Sep 07, 2005 at 04:35:49 PM EST
[ Parent ]

That is who Amy Goodman cited....We have to think two steps ahead so we can be one step ahead of them. They have this all planned out. So when something like this does happen, they are jumpping for joy.

And to tell you the truth, I wouldn't doubt that they are very aware that global warming stregthens a hurricane. So they set themselves up just waiting for something like this to happen. There are too many coincidences that happens to tie all of them together.

They have just sank to a new low, the so called Party of Lincoln are just a bunch of <font color="#CC0000">Grotesquely Obnoxious Panderers</font> who have nothing better to do but spread libelous sludge because they lack the integrity to stand behind their words which they easily throw when it suits them. What they really need to do is crawl back under their rock, where they find refuge hiding in their primordial darkness and slime!
Corruption and hypocrisy ought not to be inevitable products of democracy, as they undoubtedly are today. - Gandhi
by XicanoPwr on Wed Sep 07, 2005 at 06:58:45 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Now where's my story? lol.

by pb on Wed Sep 07, 2005 at 07:40:22 PM EST
I agree with all your points, but I'm not sure I see easy solutions to this.

My own preference would be to have only public money finance campaigns in the first place, but I see problems with determining just who would qualify for that and how (I would predict that Dems and the GOP would get it ... third parties would have difficulty qualifying, and thus we'd still be stuck with the two corporate parties).

I also don't quite see how we can outlaw lobbying outright. The reasoning behind having lobbyists in the first place seems sound to me -- like why we have labor unions. If farmers or vets, for example, join together to finance one official "voice" to represent their interests, this seems much more effective than having hundreds of thousands of individual vets trying to keep track of every conceivable bill affecting them before Congress.

So I'm curious as to what specific legislative action you think could be taken to lessen monied interests that would still allow legitimate special interest groups (and I don't mean that in a negative sense although the term has come to be taken in a negative way) to give feedback and suggestions to the government.

by SusanG on Thu Sep 08, 2005 at 10:20:54 AM EST

The problem is that the GOP will not pass them.

HR 2412 - The Special Interest Lobbying and Ethics Accountability Act of 2005 (SILEA)
Authored by Reps. Marty Meehan (D-MA) and Rahm Emanuel (D-IL)

This bill amends the Lobby Disclosure Act of 1995 (LDA), which requires organizations that engage in a certain amount of lobbying activity to register and file disclosure reports. It focuses on four main areas of reform: enhancing lobby disclosure, slowing the revolving door between Congress and lobbying firms, curbing excesses in privately funded travel, and strengthening enforcement and oversight of ethics and lobbying disclosure. There is no general exemption for nonprofit organizations, except for churches and their integrated auxiliaries.

Increased Disclosure
To enhance lobby disclosure, the bill would require lobbyists to file financial disclosures quarterly rather than semi-annually. Charities that use the IRS lobbying expenditure test could still file the Form 990 in lieu of the LDA forms. Other nonprofits would have to comply with the legislation's requirements.

The bill also requires electronic filing of lobbying disclosure reports. Currently, the usefulness of LDA reports is limited by their lack of timeliness. The semi-annual reports are often filed when lobbying on a bill has been completed, limiting access to information on the amounts spent on specific legislative battles.

Reports to Include Grassroots Lobbying
Legislation will mandate that lobbyists that meet the LDA threshold must disclose amounts spent on grassroots lobbying. However, grassroots lobbying expenses, in any amount, would not count toward the disclosure threshold. Consequently, an organization that only conducts grassroots lobbying would not be required to disclose under LDA. Additionally, organizations that use the IRS lobby expenditure test would not have to file additional forms, as grassroots lobbying expenditures are already disclosed on the Form 990.

Communications by charities to their own "members, employees and shareholders" would be exempt from the reporting requirements. However, neither the LDA nor SILEA defines who constitutes a "member". Form 990 filers could ostensibly continue to use the Internal Revenue Service definition of member. Under IRS regulation 56.4911-5, a member is defined as someone that contributes more than a nominal amount of time or money to the organization. Other nonprofits could possibly use their organization's definition of membership, if the organization has so defined it.

Opponents of grassroots lobbying disclosure are concerned that the requirement would chill nonprofit's freedom of speech due to the increased financial burdens that come with increased reporting requirements. An increase in cost may preclude small nonprofits from engaging in lobbying activities. Proponents of grassroots disclosure argue increased disclosure will deter some lobbyists and clients from improper activities and expose sham nonprofits that operate as fronts for private corporate interests.

Coalition Membership Disclosure
SILEA also contains a provision to provide transparency of anonymous lobbying coalitions by requiring members of lobbying coalitions to report their involvement. This requirement is identical to a provision in HR 1302, the Stealth Lobbying Disclosure Act, introduced by Rep. Lloyd Doggett (D-TX) earlier this year. The provision contains a total exception for 501(c)(3) organizations. Other 501(c) organizations, such as social welfare organizations, unions and trade associations, are also exempt if they have "substantial exempt activities other than lobbying with respect to a specific issue for which it engaged the person filing the registration statement". The term "substantial" is undefined. It is unclear whether it refers to an entire subject area, such as children, or sub-topics such as child health or child nutrition.

Congressional Travel
The recent scandals involving Rep. Tom Delay (R-TX) was the main reason for requiring nonprofits, when sponsoring travel costs for a member of Congress or their staff, to submit written certification verifying that the trip was not planned or financed by a registered federal lobbyist. The legislation bans lobbyists from arranging travel for members or staff.

Increased Oversight
The legislation would direct the Government Accountability Office (GAO) to investigate and report to Congress twice annually on the enforcement of lobbying regulations. The House and Senate Clerk's Office has oversight of lobbying registering requirements, but has little enforcement power. The GAO is charged with ensuring those offices have the resources for effective oversight and enforcement.

S 1398 - Lobbying and Ethics Reform Act of 2005
Author: Sen. Russ Feingold (D-WI)

The bill is substantially similar to SILEA (see above).

Both bills face opposition both in the House and the Senate. Last checked SILEA bill had 72 Democratic cosponsors, and no Republicans. Feingold's has already been determind as a no go, the Senate does not feel like taking up legislation to overhaul lobbying regulation this year, and his bill currently has no cosponsors.

I think those two bills are a good start. But lets face, the GOP are enjoying their power. But lets some Democrat where the ones getting caught with their hand in the money jar, I bet you anything they would not only putting their faces on the front page, but they would come up with every type of reform bill they can think of.
Corruption and hypocrisy ought not to be inevitable products of democracy, as they undoubtedly are today. - Gandhi
by XicanoPwr on Thu Sep 08, 2005 at 02:56:16 PM EST
[ Parent ]

about churches being exempt.

I could really see a scenario where Exxon "donates" lots of money to Pat Robertson's church, and he in turn lobbies the government (during national prayer breakfasts, of course) for Exxon.

Man, this administration is making me cynical.

by SusanG on Thu Sep 08, 2005 at 10:01:36 PM EST
[ Parent ]

I can see why the church's are exempt, sure you will have your Pat Robertson's or Jerry Farwell's using their churches to a vehicle for Big Businesses, but what if it was MLK or Rev Al Sharpton or Jesse Jackson, do we punish them for Robertson's crimes.

The sad thing is the GOP know this and they will continue to exploit it.
Corruption and hypocrisy ought not to be inevitable products of democracy, as they undoubtedly are today. - Gandhi
by XicanoPwr on Thu Sep 08, 2005 at 10:36:08 PM EST
[ Parent ]

unfortunately, i'll not have lots of time to get to either, here, but the easy answer is that i don't have an easy answer beyond the reality of identifying the massiveness of the problem ==> it's systemic and expression of the belief that it goes back to the "Corporate Personhood" issue, at its base.

will be back on both these issues.


by luaptifer on Thu Sep 08, 2005 at 06:50:21 PM EST

Support ePluribus Media -- Support Citizen Powered Journalism!

ePluribus Media

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

members


community front page

make a new account


Username:
Password:

create account | faq | search | community front page |